Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

OC School District Rejects Councilman's Proposal That Teachers Carry Guns

stressed-teacher-chalkboard.jpg
Would teachers feel less stress if they were allowed to bring their gun to school? (Photo by olly via Shutterstock)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

As part of the ongoing civic reaction to last week's horrific mass shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, one Orange County school district is already saying no to a councilman's proposal their teachers carry firearms.

In a letter put forth Wednesday to the Capistrano Unified School District, San Juan Capistrano City Councilman Derek Reeve set forth his proposed plan to help "empower" teachers, staff, and parent volunteers at their schools to bring firearms they may already own to campuses in order to maintain safety, reports the Capistrano Dispatch.

In his letter, as published in full by the Dispatch, Reeve explains that the chain link fences on school grounds provide a false security, and that mass shootings often happen in places that are "gun-free" zones--making banning guns ineffectual. In fact, as Reeve explains, letting adults on campuses who are already gun owners BYOG is a cheap solution:

No teacher or staff member should be required to carry firearms, however many already own and are trained with their own firearms. The firearms can be easily and safely secured in the classrooms. Furthermore, this would require no additional funding. Volunteer parents are also a viable option. Another alternative would be to hire armed security; however this would require a funding source. Regardless security must be armed! While armed security is more costly, unarmed security is no security at all.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the school district turned down Reeve's proposal:
“Like school districts everywhere, we’re getting lots of well-intended suggestions and ideas on how to increase student security and safety in schools,” [CUSD's Marcus] Walton said. “While we appreciate the councilman’s interest in this topic, we will not entertain any proposal to have staff persons carry firearms.”

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today