Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
NPR News

Upcoming British Election May Determine Welfare State's Fate

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 3:36

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

One month from today, British voters will go to the polls. Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron leads the current coalition government. He wants another term in office. His rival is Labor Party Leader Ed Miliband. But no matter who wins, this election could mean cuts to the British welfare state. NPR's Ari Shapiro reports from London.

ARI SHAPIRO, BYLINE: This center in West London provides services for homeless people - showers, food, counseling. A few years ago, about 80 people came here each day. The numbers started to grow, and now the center limits its services to a hundred people a day, even though 130 or more often show up looking for help. Lorraine Johnson works here.

LORRAINE JOHNSON: You know, we're seeing more women living on the streets. We're having more people coming to us with children, people that are desperate; families in situations that have no food.

SHAPIRO: Britain has cut its welfare budget steadily over the last five years. Johnson says that translates directly to her front door.

JOHNSON: Definitely within the last year or so we've really seen a massive impact. People who were housed are now becoming homeless again.

SHAPIRO: When the financial crisis hit in 2008, the U.S. used a stimulus program - government spending - to boost the economy. Britain chose the path of austerity - cutting government spending, including public services. Now the question is what will happen after voters go to the polls next month. Duncan O'Leary studies these trends at the London think tank Demos.

Sponsored message

DUNCAN O'LEARY: The election, I think, will make quite a big difference to what happens to the U.K.'s welfare state in the next five years.

SHAPIRO: This election is not a choice between growing the social safety net or shrinking it. Both parties want to make cuts. It's just a question of how deep those cuts will be. The divide might sound familiar to people who follow American politics. At a debate last week, Prime Minister David Cameron said he wants to balance the books without raising taxes.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

DAVID CAMERON: What is the alternative to making reductions on welfare? It is putting up taxes and cutting people's pay.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: But wait - let us explain - no - just...

CAMERON: I don't want to see that happen.

SHAPIRO: Labor leader Ed Miliband argues for a mix of tax hikes and spending cuts.

Sponsored message

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

ED MILIBAND: Cuts will have to come, but we can do it in a balanced way. We can do it in a fair way.

SHAPIRO: Either way, Duncan O'Leary, at Demos, says people in Britain will feel the changes that lie ahead, even if they did not notice any changes over the last five years of cuts.

O'LEARY: Some people give the analogy of giving blood. If you give blood once, your body can cope with it. If you give it again, it tires you out a lot more. And I think you could make the same analogy with spending cuts as well. There are certain efficiencies or reductions in spending that you can make once, but make them again and again, it becomes a lot harder.

SHAPIRO: Political leaders believe the current system is simply unsustainable. Sheila Lawlor directs the think tank Politeia.

SHEILA LAWLOR: What we've seen in the last 20 years, 30 years, is the growth of huge levels of people for whom the state has become the breadwinner. It provides housing. It provides a weekly income, as well as providing those universal benefits, like health care and education. And something is going to give.

SHAPIRO: This transformation could make Britain a lot more like the United States, says economist John Van Reenen. He directs the Center for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics. People will have to pay more for services, he says, and there may be less help for those who need it.

Sponsored message

JOHN VAN REENEN: If that actually goes ahead, I don't think people have really thought about what that will mean for service provision. So I think it will actually mean quite a different way of providing the kind of services that people have been used to.

SHAPIRO: But it's worth remembering one more way the U.K. is like the US - politicians here don't always keep their campaign promises, especially when it comes to cutting spending. Ari Shapiro, NPR News, London. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today