Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
NPR News

Emergency Contraception and the Pregnancy Debate

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:00
Listen

LINDA WERTHEIMER, host:

This is MORNING EDITION from NPR News. With Steve Inskeep, I'm Linda Wertheimer.

The Food and Drug Administration has until the end of this month to decide whether to allow emergency contraception--the so-called morning-after pill--to be sold without a prescription. Critics say the medication causes very early abortions. The Food and Drug Administration classifies it as a contraceptive that prevents pregnancy. Who's right depends upon the answer to the question `When does pregnancy start?' NPR's Julie Rovner reports.

JULIE ROVNER reporting:

Luke Vander Bleek of Morrison, Illinois, is a pharmacist who fills prescriptions for monthly birth control pills but not for emergency contraception, even though it consists of higher doses of some of those same birth control pills. He told a US House committee last week that his problem is not one of chemical makeup, but of intent.

(Soundbite of House committee hearing)

Mr. LUKE VANDER BLEEK (Pharmacist): Emergency contraception has only one FDA indication, to be taken after unprotected sex or contraceptive failure.

Sponsored message

ROVNER: Van der Bleek says his understanding of emergency contraception is that it can stop an egg from being fertilized, which he doesn't object to, or it can stop an already fertilized egg from implanting itself in the woman's uterus, to which he does object.

(Soundbite of House committee hearing)

Mr. VANDER BLEEK: I have regard for the third person in the relationship. There's me, there's the expectant mother that comes in and there is the live child that I have to recognize has a possibility of existing and that my involvement in dispensing this prescription is involvement in the extinguishing of that life.

ROVNER: But most doctors say that fertilized egg alone does not constitute the beginning of a pregnancy. Tina Raine is an obstetrician-gynecologist at the University of California-San Francisco.

Dr. TINA RAINE (University of California-San Francisco): We consider or define a pregnancy as beginning when a fertilized egg has implanted or established itself in the uterus.

ROVNER: Raine says what really renders a woman pregnant from a medical point of view is a positive pregnancy test.

Dr. RAINE: And the pregnancy test detects the hormone that begins secreting once the pregnancy has established itself in the uterus.

Sponsored message

ROVNER: Exactly when pregnancy begins is more than a medical question, says Rachel Benson Gold of the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health research group.

Ms. RACHEL BENSON GOLD (Alan Guttmacher Institute): It's a critical distinction because how you define when a pregnancy begins is how you distinguish between what is preventing a pregnancy and what is terminating a pregnancy.

ROVNER: In other words, what's a contraceptive and what's an abortion. State laws on the subject vary, but the federal government has long agreed with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists that pregnancy begins at implantation. For example, language known as the Hite Amendment forbids federal funding for most abortions under the Medicaid program, yet despite that restriction, Gold says, coverage is available for, quote...

Ms. GOLD: ..."drugs or devices to prevent implantation of the fertilized ovum." In other words, if the purpose of the drug is to prevent implantation, it is not considered an abortion for purposes of the Hite Amendment.

ROVNER: An even stronger statement, she says, comes as part of federal regulations establishing safeguards for research on pregnant women.

Ms. GOLD: In that context, they've defined, you know, what constitutes pregnant, that pregnancy encompasses the period of time from implantation until delivery.

ROVNER: But abortion opponents say asking when pregnancy begins is the wrong question. Joseph DeCook is a retired obstetrician-gynecologist from Holland, Michigan, and vice chair of the American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Sponsored message

Dr. JOSEPH DeCOOK (American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists): It's not that important when, quote, "pregnancy" starts. If you're looking at it from the sanctity of life standpoint, an individual human being starts at fertilization. Nobody questions that, nobody. I mean, a fertilized human egg doesn't--never becomes a pig or a bird. It always becomes a human being.

ROVNER: DeCook did prescribe birth controls when he practiced, which not all members of his organization do. He didn't prescribe emergency contraception but not because he thought it could cause an abortion, rather, he says, because he wasn't sure how it worked.

Dr. DeCOOK: So I didn't practice the kind of medicine where I gave stuff to pregnant women and didn't know how it worked.

ROVNER: A further complication is the ongoing confusion between emergency contraception and mifepristone, also known as RU-486, which does cause an abortion. OB-GYN Raine says the two are completely different.

Dr. RAINE: Emergency contraception does not have an effect on an established pregnancy and the abortion pill, or RU-486, that is designed to actually interrupt an established pregnancy.

ROVNER: In fact, says Raine, progesterone, the main chemical in emergency contraception, is often used to support a pregnancy once it's been established. Still, the fight over emergency contraception is already giving elected officials fits. In just the past two weeks, two Republican governors with pro-choice records and 2008 presidential aspirations--Massachusetts' Mitt Romney and New York's George Pataki--both vetoed bills that would make emergency contraception more easily available.

Julie Rovner, NPR News, Washington. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today