Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Now LA Can Return to Improving For the Good of It

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The United States Olympic Committee just announced that Chicago has won the honor of representing America as possible host city for the 2016 Olympics.

Before you go kick the dog or jump off the Hollywood sign, you should be sighing a breath of relief.

Today's vote in Washington doesn't mean that Chicago will get the Summer Olympic games, it just means that they can spend more money over the next two years to compete against international cities like Tokyo, Dubai, Rome, and Tel Aviv to try to woo the eye of the International Olympic Committee in October of 2009.

As LAist contributer Kemp Powers wrote last month, even if Chicago wins again in two years, it will come at a cost of $6 billion.

While there is no doubt that improving a city for the good of winning and hosting a successful Olympics is good for a city socially, civicly, and economically, there's no guarantees for any of that.

Sponsored message

Indeed, one would think that if the same speculators, investors, and businesspeople could find value in raising billions of dollars of investment for improvements to LA for a few weeks of running and jumping, surely there must be some value in raising those funds to improve Los Angeles JUST CUZ.

Imagine if over just the next two years while Chicago spends millions to get their act and city together LA spends just as much time, effort, and money solely focused on improving the LA public schools.

Couldn't an argument be made that an infusion of cash for teacher's salaries, more schools, more books, more supplies, and more after-school activities would help put a dent in crime, gang activity, and increase not just the quality of life in LA, but the overall quality of Los Angelenos?

Sure, it's not as sexy to say, "we spent $10 million on getting several dozen LA high schools science equipment - microscopes, beakers, charts, chemicals, etc" as it is to say, "we're sponsoring the US women's rowing team's media brunch at the Beverly Hills Hotel", but there are tradeoffs for everything.

Let's hope Mayor Tony and the rest of the movers and shakers who were all pumped up about LA 2016 will now shift that energy for making LA 2008 and LA 2009 and LA 2010 as great as it can be.

photo by Miss Maria

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today