With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
No, Koreatown Won't Be Split Up By Little Bangladesh. Here's What Tuesday's Vote Is Actually About
Earlier this month, a flier shared on Reddit made some waves in Los Angeles.
The resulting discussion thread has grown to nearly 250 comments, which range from extremely confused to really angry.
The leaflet in question is jarring. It urges readers that the community members "need YOUR vote TO KEEP KOREATOWN!" and suggests that the neighborhood's borders are in danger of being repurposed to make way for "Bangladesh Town."
But that's not true. The election in question is not to redraw Koreatown's physical borders. It's to decide whether or not to create a new neighborhood council in the area.
Los Angeles has more than 95 neighborhood councils already, but this election specifically focuses on splitting the existing Wilshire-Center Koreatown neighborhood council into two.
"Proponents for this new subdivision would like to create the Wilshire-Center Bangladesh neighborhood council within the existing council boundaries," said Chris Garcia, a city project manager in charge of L.A.'s neighborhood council elections.
The existing neighborhood council encompasses a central part of Koreatown and consists of council districts 10 and 13. But Koreatown as a whole is much larger and goes beyond the neighborhood council's borders.
The split would favor Little Bangladesh in terms of council jurisdiction area, according to their proposed boundary map. It would start north at Melrose Avenue and run south to 5th Street between Western and Vermont avenues.
The Little Bangladesh community's effort has been met with heavy resistance in Koreatown, just the latest spat in long-simmering tension between the two neighborhoods.
An official statement from the Korean American Coalition of Los Angeles accused the formation committee of failing to reach out to Korean and Latino residents and business owners, adding that the proposal "sidesteps any effort to honor and build community together."
After misinformation about the subdivision election began to spread, the office of the L.A. City Clerk's office sent out a FAQ in an effort to clear things up. One of the points highlighted in the release was why create another neighborhood council.
"The proponents have stated that, for an area that has approximately 100,000 residents, additional representation is needed," the FAQ states, adding that those in favor of a new council feel the current 26 board seats within the existing Koreatown-area council "are not enough to fully represent the area."
In-person voting begins at 2 p.m. Tuesday at two locations. The polls close at 8 p.m.
- Harvard Elementary School - Multi-Purpose Room, 330 N. Harvard Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90004
- Founders Church of Religious Science - Hornaday Hall, 3281 W. 6th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90020
Think of neighborhood councils like a liaison between the community and elected officials and city departments.
"Each gets about $42,000 a year from the city and they're comprised of elected board members who provide community support, put on events, sponsor local organizations, really advocate on the neighborhood's behalf with the city," said Garcia.
The subdivision would in essence double the amount of representation in the community by creating a newly elected board and a new amount of funding that that board can put to use.
LAist news editor Ryan Fonseca contributed to this story.
Editor's note: A version of this story was also on the radio. Listen to it here on KPCC's Take Two.
News happens every day. Here at LAist, our goal is to cover the stories that matter to you and the community you live in. Now that we're part of KPCC, those stories (including this one you're on right now!) are made possible by generous people like you. Independent, local journalism isn't cheap, but with your support we can keep delivering it. Donate now.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.