Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
No, Koreatown Won't Be Split Up By Little Bangladesh. Here's What Tuesday's Vote Is Actually About

Earlier this month, a flier shared on Reddit made some waves in Los Angeles.
The resulting discussion thread has grown to nearly 250 comments, which range from extremely confused to really angry.
The leaflet in question is jarring. It urges readers that the community members "need YOUR vote TO KEEP KOREATOWN!" and suggests that the neighborhood's borders are in danger of being repurposed to make way for "Bangladesh Town."
But that's not true. The election in question is not to redraw Koreatown's physical borders. It's to decide whether or not to create a new neighborhood council in the area.
Los Angeles has more than 95 neighborhood councils already, but this election specifically focuses on splitting the existing Wilshire-Center Koreatown neighborhood council into two.
"Proponents for this new subdivision would like to create the Wilshire-Center Bangladesh neighborhood council within the existing council boundaries," said Chris Garcia, a city project manager in charge of L.A.'s neighborhood council elections.
The existing neighborhood council encompasses a central part of Koreatown and consists of council districts 10 and 13. But Koreatown as a whole is much larger and goes beyond the neighborhood council's borders.
The split would favor Little Bangladesh in terms of council jurisdiction area, according to their proposed boundary map. It would start north at Melrose Avenue and run south to 5th Street between Western and Vermont avenues.
The Little Bangladesh community's effort has been met with heavy resistance in Koreatown, just the latest spat in long-simmering tension between the two neighborhoods.
An official statement from the Korean American Coalition of Los Angeles accused the formation committee of failing to reach out to Korean and Latino residents and business owners, adding that the proposal "sidesteps any effort to honor and build community together."
After misinformation about the subdivision election began to spread, the office of the L.A. City Clerk's office sent out a FAQ in an effort to clear things up. One of the points highlighted in the release was why create another neighborhood council.
"The proponents have stated that, for an area that has approximately 100,000 residents, additional representation is needed," the FAQ states, adding that those in favor of a new council feel the current 26 board seats within the existing Koreatown-area council "are not enough to fully represent the area."
In-person voting begins at 2 p.m. Tuesday at two locations. The polls close at 8 p.m.
- Harvard Elementary School - Multi-Purpose Room, 330 N. Harvard Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90004
- Founders Church of Religious Science - Hornaday Hall, 3281 W. 6th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90020
Think of neighborhood councils like a liaison between the community and elected officials and city departments.
"Each gets about $42,000 a year from the city and they're comprised of elected board members who provide community support, put on events, sponsor local organizations, really advocate on the neighborhood's behalf with the city," said Garcia.
The subdivision would in essence double the amount of representation in the community by creating a newly elected board and a new amount of funding that that board can put to use.
LAist news editor Ryan Fonseca contributed to this story.
Editor's note: A version of this story was also on the radio. Listen to it here on KPCC's Take Two.
News happens every day. Here at LAist, our goal is to cover the stories that matter to you and the community you live in. Now that we're part of KPCC, those stories (including this one you're on right now!) are made possible by generous people like you. Independent, local journalism isn't cheap, but with your support we can keep delivering it. Donate now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The new ordinance applies to certain grocers operating in the city and has led to some self-checkout lanes to shutter.
-
Children asked to waive right to see a judge in exchange for $2,500
-
There’s still a lot to be determined as the refinery, which supplies about one-fifth of Southern California's vehicle fuels, works to restore production and as data is collected.
-
The FCC voted to end E-Rate discounts for library hotspot lending and school bus Wi-Fi.
-
About half the Pacific Airshow’s 2025 lineup has been grounded because of the federal government shutdown.
-
USC says it’s reviewing the letter also sent to eight other prestigious schools nationwide. California's governor vowed that any California universities that sign will lose state funding.