With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
LA And Long Beach School Districts Have Concerns About Gov. Newsom’s School Reopening Plan
Superintendents from seven of the state’s largest school districts, including Los Angeles and Long Beach Unified, have sent a letter to Governor Newsom pushing back on his newly proposed reopening plan for schools.
Newsom’s Safer Schools for All Plan, released in late December, encourages California’s 1,037 public school districts to draft plans for offering in-person instruction, once COVID-19 cases reach a low enough threshold.
After those district’s reopening guidelines are approved by local labor unions, county and state officials, and adopted, they can be eligible to receive $450 per student. For LAUSD, that could mean at least $180 million.
But local school districts are not ready to jump on board yet. The letter argues that Newsom’s plan disadvantages large school districts, like LAUSD, that serve low-income families—many of whom are infected with coronavirus at disproportionate rates.
If those schools can’t open for in-person learning because of surging case rates, local districts worry they could lose out on the money offered. The letter calls Newsom’s proposal a reversal of the state’s commitment to equitable funding:
“Affluent communities where family members can work from home will see schools open with more funding. Low-income communities bearing the brunt of the virus will see schools remain closed with lower funding.”
Instead of that, the signatory superintendents want money to be available for all schools.
Superintendent Jill Baker of Long Beach Unified says she signed the letter because she supports reopening schools, but wants to see a statewide standard for doing that, instead of leaving it up to individual districts, as the Safer Schools Plan suggests.
“None of the school districts were consulted about the plan before it was released,” Baker said. “The letter was an effort to describe what we think needs to be done from here, as the largest urban districts in the state of California.”
Baker says Long Beach Unified might only receive residual funding according to Newsom’s plan, after smaller districts with lower case rates get the first opportunities.
As of January 5, Los Angeles County had a daily new case rate of 65.8 positive cases of coronavirus out of 100,000 residents, adjusted for testing. For classes to reopen, a county must report less than 28 positive cases out of 100,000 residents over a seven-day average.
“Our proposal is to think about an equity-centered approach, to look at the variation of needs across the state,” Baker said.
Along with the demands about equal funding, the letter outlines several other declarations and recommendations:
The districts say they are ready to open for in-person instruction whenever health standards are met and the state determines schools should be open
Basic reopening guidelines should be standardized for every school district. Once safe, all districts should be mandated to offer in person instruction
Public health funds, not money from Proposition 98, should be used for school-site COVID-19 testing and other health-related costs
COVID-19 testing and vaccinations should be integrated with schools and funded by the state
Supplemental state funding should go towards reopening special education in-person
- The state should explain how COVID-19 caseload thresholds are determined for deciding if in-person instruction is safe
UPDATE, Jan. 7, 12 pm: This article has been updated to reflect the coronavirus case rate throughout Los Angeles County.
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.