With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
LAPD Chief: Cops Who Mistook Delivery Women For Christopher Dorner Were Wrong To Shoot Them
One year after the Christopher Dorner manhunt, the LAPD has determined that the officers who fired on two women, mistaking them for Dorner, were in the wrong.
Chief Charlie Beck and the Los Angeles Police Commission, a civilian panel, both agreed on the ruling that the eight officers involved violated the department's rules on excessive force. The next step is to determine what kind of penalties are in store for them, according to ABC 7.
A separate LAPD panel made of high-ranking cops urged the officers to be cleared of any wrongdoing, but Beck disagreed with them, the Los Angeles Times reports.
Beck held a news conference today that outlined his decision on the case. Much of the conference was about the need to hire good officers:
Support for LAist comes from
LAPD police chief Beck: "There is nothing more important than who we select to protect our families."
— Erika A. Aguilar (@erikaaaguilar) February 5, 2014
Beck says one of most important lessons is importance of who #LAPD hires. On #Dorner: "Four years later he comes back to haunt us all."
— Kate Mather (@katemather) February 5, 2014
The incident, which happened on Feb. 7 of last year, went like this: the officers, whose identities have been kept secret due to the possibility of retaliation, were guarding the home of a fellow officer named in Dorner's manifesto when they received word of a truck that matched Dorner's description in the area. It was 4:30 a.m. and still dark outside. When they came across the truck, they fired over 100 bullets into it.
The truck actually belonged to two women, Margie Carranza and her mother, Emma Hernandez, who were delivering newspapers. Only when the officers realized that they shot a Blue Toyota Tacoma (as opposed to Dorner's grey Nissan Titan) did they realize their mistake.
Hernandez was shot in the back and Carranza suffered gunshot wounds to her hands. Last April, the women were awarded $4.2 million and money for a new truck, but Hernandez still has emotional scars from the incident.
Earlier in January, another batch of officers were cleared of any wrongdoing in regards to a second shooting in the same neighborhood, which was set off by the shooting of Carranza and Hernandez. Their review noted that those officers were in "panic mode," which clouded their judgment.
The department also ruled on another shooting related to Dorner today, saying that the shootout in Corona that actually involved Dorner was justified, City News Service reports.
Support for LAist comes from
"As in all use-of-force incidents, the department has completed a thorough review and will adopt the lessons learned, both good and bad, from these incidents," Steve Soboroff, president of the Los Angeles Police Commission, said in a statement.
The officers involved in the shooting have been assigned to desk duty as the investigation progresses. Their fates remain unclear, but Beck said in a news conference today that their penalties can range from retraining to termination.
Related:
Police Shoot Newspaper Delivery Women Mistaken For Christopher Dorner During Manhunt [UPDATED]
Women Shot By LAPD During Dorner Manhunt Finally Given $40,000 For New Truck
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Heavy rain from the early-season storm could trigger debris flows. Snow is also possible above 7,000 feet. -
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership announces that 11% of the workforce is being cut. -
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
Best of LAist