With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Get Ready To Pay Half The Bill For Your Landlord's Earthquake Retrofitting
A pancaked apartment building with a soft-first story after the Northridge Earthquake. (Eric Gelinas via Flickr Creative Commons)
()
The L.A. City Council voted to allow landlords pass on exactly one half of the costs associated with seismically retrofitting a potentially unsafe building to their tenants.
The decision came on Wednesday after a year of savage debates before the city between tenants unions and landlords. Tenants argue building owners should be responsible for their own property's upkeep, including seismic retrofits. Landlords argue tenants should be liable because retrofitting is, well, expensive!
Tenants can see this reflected as a $38 per month increase in their own rent for 10 years. While the increase is optional, it's probably a safe to bet that if you live in one of the purportedly unsafe buildings your landlord will increase rent.
Last October, the City Council voted unanimously to overhaul Los Angeles' retrofitting requirements, giving the city some of the most strict regulations in the entire country. The new rules call for an estimated 15,000 at-risk buildings across L.A. to be evaluated to determine whether or not they need retrofitting to better withstand an earthquake's shaking.
Support for LAist comes from
So-called dingbat apartments with open, or 'soft' first stories (such as carports), and older concrete buildings are those most vulnerable to damage in a major earthquake. Between the 1971 Sylmar earthquake and the 1994 Northridge earthquake, 65 people died when buildings of these types collapsed.
Incidentally, $38 per month is actually just more than half the value that ($75 per month) landlords are allowed technically allowed to increase rent for retrofitting under current L.A. City housing law. But the new requirements passed last October pushed the issue towards immediacy. Tenants groups argued a $75 increase would be simply too much for a lot of renters.
Owners of the soft-story wood frame buildings will have up to seven years to strengthen their property; those who own concrete buildings have 25.
Much of the justification on the landlords' side comes from independent 'mom-and-pop' type landlords, who may have invested in a building as a source of retirement income. While, yes, the cost of seismic analysis, retrofitting, and interest on any loans taken out to cover that retrofitting are costs that could challenge some of sanctity of a lush retirement, increasing rent $38 dollars per month is $38 dollars removed each month from the hypothetical retirement accounts of some of L.A.'s most cash-strapped demographics.
From the tenants' side, this begins to look like a bailout for people who made bad investments, and should have been more risk averse when they purchased a building that could fall down in an earthquake.
It's not like we haven't known about the dangers of soft first stories and brittle concrete for decades.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures. -
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump. -
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence. -
This is the one time you can do this legally! -
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.” -
While working for the county, the DA’s office alleges that 13 employees fraudulently filed for unemployment, claiming to earn less than $600 a week.
Best of LAist