Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

KPCC Archive

Why did Villaraigosa get shut out of the Governor's race?

Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa concedes in the race to be California's next governor on Tuesday, June 5, 2018.
Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa concedes in the race to be California's next governor on Tuesday, June 5, 2018.
(
Signe Larsen/KPCC
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today . 

Early in the race to become California's next governor, it looked like former Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa had a good shot of at least advancing to the general election. But he finished in a distant third Tuesday night, ending his campaign.  

Lt. Governor and former San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom sailed into the general with about a third of the vote, and Republican businessman John Cox picked up over a quarter of votes. 

But Villaraigosa only captured about 13 percent of the vote. So why didn't a well known Latino politician who led California's largest city for eight years do better in the primary? 

Latino voters didn't put him over the top

Support for LAist comes from

Villaraigosa was fighting to become the first elected Latino governor of a state where Latinos make up the single largest ethnic group. But political analysts say Villaraigosa's poor showing suggests he failed to inspire more Latinos to turn out.

In a post-election discussion on KPCC's AirTalk, Caltech political science professor Michael Alvarez said Villaraigosa's campaign tested the notion that a SoCal candidate could get ahead by tapping into a large pool of Latino voters.

"At this point, it looks as if that didn't work well for Villaraigosa," Alvarez said.

Menlo College political science professor Melissa Michelson said Latino turnout tends to be low, and this election doesn't appear to be an exception. 

"I didn't see that Villaraigosa was doing more to get out the Latino vote than the other Democratic candidates, particularly Gavin Newsom," Michelson said. "It could be that Latino voters just weren’t feeling the love."

The Democratic frontrunner strategically elevated a Republican challenger

The rules of California's top two primary can make candidates do strange things. For instance, when the leading Democrat spends money on ads to raise the profile and appeal of a Republican candidate.

Support for LAist comes from

But that strategy seems to have paid off for Newsom, who would rather face a long-shot GOP candidate than a better-known Democratic rival like Villaraigosa in November. 

During the primary, Newsom's campaign aired ads that aligned Cox with Donald Trump and the NRA — a turn-off for Democrats, but an implicit message to Republican voters that Cox was their guy.

Newsom's tactic may have encouraged Republicans to rally around Cox, making it harder for Villaraigosa to rise above the fray.

SoCal voters just don't turn out as much as Northern California voters do

This factor may not be unique to this election, but it still didn't help LA's former mayor.

Los Angeles County consistently has lower voter turnout than counties in the San Francisco Bay Area. For instance, in the 2014 June primaries, only 17 percent of registered L.A. County voters cast a ballot, the lowest turnout in the state.

Early results indicate turnout was higher in L.A. County this year. But overall, California's historical turnout patterns tend to give an edge to Bay Area politicians like Newsom and a disadvantage to candidates like Villaraigosa who built their careers in Southern California.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist