Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Ventura stormwater runoff rules approved, not clearly understood

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 1:13
Ventura stormwater runoff rules approved, not clearly understood
Ventura stormwater runoff rules approved, not clearly understood

Los Angeles' regional water regulators have approved a set of rules to limit stormwater runoff from properties in the Ventura County area.

The L.A. Regional Water Quality Control Board has worked for three years to develop a plan that would cut pollution from runoff on new development in Ventura. A plan approved last summer requires 95 percent of land on a developed site to hold on to water that forms from three-quarters of an inch of rain.

But at a meeting this week in Ventura, last-minute changes to the plan appear to loosen that limit.

Building industry advocates have pushed to permit water to percolate into soil that acts as a filter. Then some water would flow into a creek or the ocean. It's a cheaper alternative to other water control methods in low impact development.

The Natural Resources Defense Council's Noah Garrison says it's also less reliable. Garrison attended the hearing. He says the final result confused him.

"Through a process that lasted several hours this language was altered, revised, re-proposed, discussed at length and the final discussion showed that no one really understood what the language would require. But the board went ahead and adopted it anyway," Garrison said.

The water quality board hasn’t released what it passed, and water regulators have not been available for comment. Garrison says it’s likely the plan will face more challenges in the future.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today