Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Some Metrolink trains still lack anti-crash system
Congress this week acted to extend the deadline for railroads to install new anti-collision safety systems. Most passengers of the Metrolink regional commuter rail network are already protected by it, but significant gaps remain.
About two-thirds of Metrolink's 512 miles of tracks are equipped with the system known as "positive train control." The remainder of the tracks are owned by other railroads that have not completed the installations, said Metrolink spokesman Scott Johnson.
Positive train control uses GPS, Wi-Fi, cellular technology and computer software to override manual train controls to slow or stop a locomotive that's moving too fast or at risk of a hitting another train.
"The Riverside Line is actually owned and operated by Union Pacific, so that track does not currently have positive train control," Johnson said. That line from Union Station to downtown Riverside serves nearly 100,000 riders each month.
A passenger boarding the Ventura County Metrolink line in East Ventura would ride past three stations on Union Pacific-owned tracks that do not have positive train control, while the journey from the Moorpark station to Union Station does.
"From a passenger standpoint, they don't feel any different," Johnson said of the gaps.
Beginning in June, Metrolink became the nation's first rail system to install and use positive train control.
Metrolink's head-on collision with a Union Pacific train in Chatsworth caused 25 deaths in 2008. It spurred Congress to require the new safety systems by the end of 2015. Metrolink is on track to meet that deadline for its own locomotives and track.
However, it must work with three other railroads — Union Pacific, BNSF Railway and North County Transit District — to finish out the system. Amtrak says its Southern California trains will be equipped with positive train control by the end of the year.
Larger railroads have struggled with the deadline. Edward Hamberger, head of the Association of American Railroads, blamed the complexity, new technology and large equipment orders needed to install the systems on 70,000 miles of tracks and 22,000 locomotives.
His industry group and rail shipping customers fought the deadline. Some tweeted ominous warnings that America's trains wouldn't run and store shelves would be empty.
"Well, it wasn't a threat. What it was was a reaction to the statute and the regulations," Hamberger said.
Union Pacific was among the railroads pleading for the three-year extension that both houses of Congress approved this week.
Its Southern California trains and tracks should complete installation of the system by the end of this year, said spokesman Francisco Castillo. Getting it installed nationwide will take Union Pacific until about 2018, he said.
Rep. Adam Schiff authored the 2008 bill requiring the new system, and he fought the three-year deadline extension to 2018. He wanted railroads that were unable to meet the December 2015 deadline to get individual extensions of time from the Federal Railroad Administration.
Still, he lauded Metrolink.
"Metrolink still has some distance to go with its partners on the line, but it's made more progress than most other rail lines," said Schiff. "It's technology that's proven to save lives. We're going to be kicking ourselves if we see another accident."
Map showing where positive train control is in effect on Metrolink trains:
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
L.A. County investigators have launched a probe into allegations about Va Lecia Adams Kellum and people she hired at the L.A. Homeless Services Authority.
-
L.A. Mayor Karen Bass suspended a state law allowing duplexes, calling more housing unsafe. But in Altadena, L.A. County leaders say these projects could be key for rebuilding.
-
This measure on the Nov. 4, 2025, California ballot is part of a larger battle for control of the U.S. House of Representatives next year.
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.