Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Senate rejects Blunt amendment that Dianne Feinstein calls 'Pandora's box of problems'

File: Prescription contraceptives for women sit on the counter of a drug store on August 1, 2011 in Los Angeles.
Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California says the measure's ambiguity is a "Pandora's box of problems."
(
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

In a close, 51-48 vote, the U.S. Senate has defeated the so-called Blunt amendment to the transportation bill.

The measure would have allowed employers or insurance companies to refuse health care services on religious or moral grounds, an objection to the Obama administration’s controversial birth control health coverage policy. California's Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein called the amendment “vague.”

"And in its vagary it’s a Pandora’s box of problems, because it essentially would create sort of a phony conscience clause, for four type written pages of prevention, whether it’s immunization for children, or breast exams for women. It’s not just contraception," she said.

Feinstein said she was surprised the amendment was tabled by such a narrow margin.

"It’s hard for me to understand why people would want to vote for this, because it affects children, it affects men, it affects women," she said.

The measure was an amendment to the transportation bill. Democrats characterized the amendment as an attack on women’s health; Republicans as a defense of religious freedom. Its author, Republican Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri, says the issue won’t go away. He believes the U.S. Supreme Court may have the final say.

S. 1813 Amendment

Sponsored message

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today