This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
Federal judges reject California's plan to cut prison population
Inmate Leon Browne, 21, of Los Angeles, right, sits on his bunk, which are stacked three high in a gymnasium, that has been converted into temporary "emergency" sleeping area at California State Prison-Los Angeles County in Lancaster, Calif., Friday, March 2, 2007.
(
AP Photo/Spencer Weiner
)
Listen
Federal judges reject California's plan to cut prison population
A panel of three federal judges today rejected California’s plan to reduce the inmate population.
Roughly 160,000 inmates pack facilities designed for about half that number.
Three judges found this year that overcrowded conditions prevent inmates from getting adequate medical and mental health care.
In August 2009, the judges ordered California officials to come up with proposal to reduce the number of inmates by about 44,000 over the next couple of years.
This summer California lawmakers passed a bill that would reduce the inmate population by 20,000.
The Schwarzenegger administration submitted that plan to the judges earlier this month.
Today the judges rejected it.
Sponsored message
In a written order, the federal judges called the plan “inadequate” and gave California lawmakers three weeks to present a new plan.
They said if the state fails to do so, “the court will be left with no alternative but to develop a plan independently and order it implemented.”
Gordon Hinkel, a spokesman for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation stated:
"The administration continues to object to the panel's arbitrary cap under a two-year timeline and is continuing our appeal with the US Supreme Court. The state also continues to work to implement the reforms enacted by the state budget that will reduce overcrowding without compromising public safety."
Hinkel said the Adminstration will respond to the judge's order on November 12th.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
