Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Porter Ranch: SoCal Gas-AQMD gas leak settlement finalized despite health study complaints

The answer: $1 million.
The question: How much should Southern California Gas Company, responsible for the nation's largest-ever uncontrolled natural gas leak, pay to fund a study of how the blowout affected the health of residents who live in nearby Porter Ranch?
To county health officials and some Porter Ranch residents, the million-dollar agreement appeared insufficient.
Despite those objections, Southern California Gas Company cleared the final hurdle Thursday to end a lawsuit brought by the South Coast Air Quality Management District over pollution from the nation's largest-ever uncontrolled methane leak.
The company had reached an $8.5-million settlement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District last month including the million-dollar health study, but for it to take effect and for money to change hands, both parties needed the AQMD's independent hearing board to drop its enforcement action against SoCal Gas.
The hearing board voted 5-0 Thursday to drop its order of abatement against SoCal Gas in a motion that also criticized the amount for the health study.
County health officials and some Porter Ranch residents testified before the board Thursday that the AQMD had settled for too little money for a health study. The utility had agreed to fund "the reasonable costs of a health study."
"This settlement essentially gets the gas company off the hook," said Dr. Cyrus Rangan of the county Department of Public Health. The county's position is that $1 million is not enough money to produce meaningful data.
The million-dollar study falls far short of what Public Health officials had estimated would be necessary to perform a long-term health study.
"Thirty-five to $40 million is the estimate is for the proper health study, which would be projected for 10 years or so, and perhaps longer," Dr. Cyrus Rangan said.
Attorneys for SoCal Gas and the AQMD argued that once they reached agreement on the settlement and health study amount, the independent hearing board had no further authority to extend its jurisdiction over the company.
SoCal Gas is in the latter stages of seeking clearance from state gas and utility regulators to resume filling its massive underground gas storage reservoir at the north end of the San Fernando Valley. Environmental groups, some Porter Ranch residents, several local and state-elected officials want to keep the field from resuming normal use at least until the cause of the October 2015 well blowout is fully diagnosed.
Clearing its crowded docket of one important piece of litigation helps SoCal Gas make that case that it is mending fences with public agencies and being a responsible company.
The investor-owned utility has faced investigations from a dozen federal, state and local agencies and it is named in 250 lawsuits with at least 14,000 plaintiffs, according to its annual report.
The annual report, issued this week, said the company has already incurred expenses totaling $780 million from the gas well blowout as of Dec. 31. That's up from $717 million in a report out last August.
SoCal Gas typically fills the field with gas during the summer when prices are low and withdraws the gas in the winter when it is more expensive. The company also earns money storing gas for other companies that buy their own gas from out-of-state suppliers.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.