This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
NASA downplays news about discovery by Curiosity rover on Mars (Poll)
NASA's Mars rover Curiosity dug up five scoops of sand from a patch nicknamed "Rocknest." Officials announced that findings will be presented on Monday.
(
NASA/JPL-Caltech
)
Like proud parents, NASA scientists have rhapsodized about each of the Mars rover Curiosity's accomplishments. But some say their baby's newest step isn't as monumental as the people back at mission control made it out to be.
A little over a week ago, National Public Radio reported that the Curiosity mission's principal investigator John Grotzinger said recent analysis of a scoop of Red Planet soil could yield historic results. Grotzinger's refusal to reveal specifics unleashed a wave of excitement, which led to rampant speculation, including that it may be organic compounds.
The New York Times reported that since then, NASA has remained tacit about findings, but scaled down its expectations from "earthshattering" to "interesting." According to science daily io9, the supposed exaggeration ignited much ire on the web.
But were vocal space enthusiasts too harsh?
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory clarified Grotzinger's quote via Curiosity's Twitter account:
Mashable wrote that it was a miscommunication between NPR's science correspondent Joe Palca and Grotzinger that led to the hype:
Sponsored message
"After just a few months on Mars, the Curiosity rover had made, in the NPR reporter’s words, an “earth-shaking” discovery. One so big that NASA had to quadruple-check the results..."
"What Grotzinger was actually trying to convey is that Curiosity’s data over her entire two-year mission will further our knowledge of Mars more than ever before, making it a historical mission."
Until then, how do you feel about the latest Curiosity news?
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
