Mariana Dale
has been tracking school recovery since the January 2025 fires.
Published January 27, 2026 5:00 AM
Palisades Charter High's "stadium by the sea," is still under construction as students return to the campus Tuesday.
(
Mariana Dale
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Palisades Charter High School is reopening Tuesday a little more than a year after fire tore through campus and the surrounding community.
The backstory: The Palisades Fire destroyed 30% of the campus, including 36 classrooms, storage facilities and the football stadium. Students shifted to online learning and then moved temporarily into a refurbished Santa Monica department store in April. The Los Angeles Unified School District, which leases space to the independently run charter school, coordinated the post-fire clean-up and construction of 30 new portable classrooms. LAUSD has budgeted $266 million to rebuild Pali’s campus by the end of 2028.
How the school prepared to reopen: LAUSD hired outside contractors to test, clean and retest the soil, water, air remaining and new structures for toxins related to the wildfire. ”At the moment, I'm 100% convinced that we are in a very safe environment,” said Principal Pamela Magee Monday. “We've got folks watching out to make sure that that continues into the future.”
Is it safe? Some parents have raised concerns about whether the remediation is comprehensive enough and how the test results were communicated to families. Friday, the Los Angeles Unified School District asked a group of researchers studying the health impacts of the fires to review a summary of the clean-up efforts and test results. The study co-leads, including UCLA environmental health sciences professor Yifang Zhu, concluded they would be comfortable sending their own children back to Pali High. Zhu, whose daughter is a recent graduate of the school, said the decision is ultimately up to each family. “There's no such thing as zero risk,” Zhu said. “Risk is very personal. Every family is…different.”
Palisades Charter High School reopens Tuesday a little more than a year after fire tore through campus and the surrounding community.
The Palisades Fire destroyed 30% of the campus including classrooms and the track and field. Now there is a wide grassy expanse where an academic building once stood. Bulldozers cleared the baseball diamond to make way for three dozen portable classrooms. Many of the campus’ trees are still standing with blackened trunks.
A few of the 2,400 students expected to return in-person toured the campus Monday, including junior Jackson Richmond. He said despite the changes, the campus still feels familiar.
“Nothing just beats, like, the look of Pali,” Richmond said. “Like, it's in movies for a reason.”
But other Palisades families are more cautious about returning. Some parents have raised concerns about whether the remediation efforts went far enough and how the test results were communicated to families.
“ I have mixed feelings,” said Victoria Kotlyar, parent of two sophomores. “I'm happy that they're gonna have a school to go to, but I am concerned about just the environment and if there's any pollution.”
The process to reopen the school included debris removal, cleaning, and multiple rounds of soil, water, air and surface testing in the new and remaining buildings.
LAUSD installed 36 new portable classrooms where the Palisades Charter High School baseball field once was.
(
Mariana Dale
/
LAist
)
“At the moment, I'm 100% convinced that we are in a very safe environment,” said Principal Pamela Magee on Monday. “We've got folks watching out to make sure that that continues into the future.”
Environmental testing continues
Pali High was once part of the Los Angeles Unified School District. The school converted to an independently run charter school in 1993, but continues to lease its campus from the district.
“We have full confidence that what was done was appropriate to safeguard not only our students, but our staff, students [and] the community,” said Office of Environmental Health and Safety Director Carlos Torres in a virtual community meeting on January 21.
The district did additional environmental testing in November and December 2025 to ensure the campus was not harmed by the demolition and construction in surrounding neighborhoods.
“We will be doing periodic sampling and analysis at this school and all the schools that were directly impacted by the fire,” said Deputy OEHS Director Jennifer Flores,
For example, the district has installed air sensors at the school that can detect two types of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide, which are associated with pollution.
What risks remain?
Toxins related to wildfires can linger indoors, including in porous surfaces like carpet, stuffed animals and acoustic ceiling tiles. They release into the air over time in a process called “off-gassing.”
UCLA environmental health sciences professor Yifang Zhu said one way to imagine off-gassing is through the lingering smell of cigarettes at a casino that no longer allows smoking.
A large green field lies where Pali's "J" building once stood. Junior Tiffany Jensen said she imagines eating lunch here in the future.
(
Mariana Dale
/
LAist
)
Whether those toxins harm people depends on “a combination [of] the chemicals themselves and then the level of exposures and the duration of the exposures over time,” Zhu said.
LAUSD contractors used vacuums with special filters to clean Pali’s remaining ceiling tiles. The air was tested several times and the results showed no buildup of fire-related compounds, “therefore the removal of the ceiling tiles is not necessary, and the interior spaces are safe to occupy,” read the district's report.
Palisades High Director of Operations Rafael Negroe said if a student feels ill, they should report their symptoms to their teacher and the school nurse.
“If it's determined that it could be environmentally driven, I become involved and then try to get to the source of it based on diagnosis and or symptoms,” Negroe said.
“There's no such thing as zero risk,” Zhu said. “Risk is very personal. Every family is… different.”
Students plan to revive Pali traditions
Students say they’re looking forward to reviving Pali traditions from pep rallies to the senior’s blind speed-dating event.
Homecoming returns to the campus gym Saturday. The students pushed the fall dance to the end of January to hold it on their home turf.
The theme is “A Night in Greece,” and junior Tiffany Jensen said she expects to see a lot of blue and white summer dresses.
“A year ago, no one knew what was gonna happen to Pali,” she said. “It feels so amazing to be back on the campus to see all of our teachers, our faculty, staff, everyone is really excited to come back.”
Juniors Tiffany Jensen and Jackson Richmond got a preview of the Palisades Charter High School Campus on Monday.
(
Mariana Dale
/
LAist
)
A few key features of the campus remain closed. The “stadium by the sea,” pool and related buildings, are still under construction and anticipated to reopen by the end of this February, according to Director of Operations Rafael Negroe.
Constructing a new building to replace the destroyed classrooms will take longer. LAUSD has budgeted $266 million from the bond passed in 2024 to rebuild Pali’s campus by the end of 2028. The district will also seek reimbursement from its insurers and FEMA.
Will all the families who left come back?
It’s still unclear how many families who lost homes in the fires will return or opt to transfer to schools closer to where they now live. Many of the schools damaged by January’s fires have fewer students this year. Pali’s enrollment has dropped 14% compared to before the fire, from 2,900 to 2,500 students. About 100 students are enrolled in the school's virtual learning program.
Parent Victoria Kotlyar said her family sold the property where their Palisades home once stood for “dirt cheap.”
“ We cannot wait so many years to rebuild because our kids are growing and they have nowhere to go,” Kotlyar said.
But her high school aged children, including sophomore Max Paik-Schoenberg, are committed to Pali.
“Whatever we buy, we're trying to buy something in the area so our kids can continue their education journey at these schools,” Kotlyar said. “We love the schools.”
Tuesday is the first time Paik-Schoenberg will see the Palisades since the fires. He transferred to Santa Monica High School instead of switching to virtual learning, but re-enrolled ahead of the campus reopening.
“ I'm pretty excited,” he said, “but I'm not really sure if it's gonna be the same as it was.”
Nick Gerda
is an accountability reporter who has covered local government in Southern California for more than a decade.
Published September 15, 2026 5:17 PM
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass speaks at a news conference before LAHSA's annual homeless count at El Rio Community School on Feb. 18, 2025.
(
Carlin Stiehl
/
LAist
)
Topline:
The leader of a congressional panel warned Tuesday he would use “every tool” to get Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to testify after she skipped a hearing that put L.A.’s homeless services system in the hotseat.
The context: The House panel came as multiple audits, reviews and court rulings have found L.A. has failed to ensure proper tracking of large-scale spending on homeless services — particularly through the joint city-county L.A. Homeless Services Authority, known as LAHSA.
What the mayor says: Bass had declined to testify at Tuesday’s hearing, saying she was unavailable and that it would be a “politically-motivated” attack. Her public schedule showed she planned to attend a groundbreaking of a shopping and community center in the Pacific Palisades two hours after the hearing was set to start.
The warning: Rep. Tim Burchett, the Tennessee Republican who chairs the House Oversight Committee's DOGE subcommittee, said she won't get off that easily. Bass "seems intent on evading accountability, but she knows we will not let her off the hook," Burchett said at the hearing. He added that he and the Oversight Committee’s chair would "use every tool at our disposal to secure her appearance if she does not cooperate.”
The leader of a congressional panel warned Tuesday he would use “every tool” to get Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to testify after she skipped a hearing that put L.A.’s homeless services system in the hot seat.
It came as multiple audits, reviews and court rulings have found L.A. has failed to ensure proper tracking of large-scale spending on homeless services — particularly through the joint city-county L.A. Homeless Services Authority, known as LAHSA. Much of the money is federal dollars authorized by Congress.
Bass had declined to testify at Tuesday’s hearing, saying she was unavailable and that it would be a “politically motivated” attack. Her public schedule showed she planned to attend a groundbreaking of a shopping and community center in the Pacific Palisades two hours after the hearing was set to start.
Rep. Tim Burchett, the Tennessee Republican who chairs the House Oversight Committee's DOGE subcommittee, said she won't get off that easily.
Bass "seems intent on evading accountability, but she knows we will not let her off the hook," Burchett said at the hearing. He added that he and the Oversight Committee’s chair would "use every tool at our disposal to secure her appearance if she does not cooperate.”
House committees and subcommittees can issue subpoenas to compel witnesses to testify or provide documents.
Just before the hearing got underway, Bass called it "the latest attack on Los Angeles by the Trump Administration and his allies in Congress.”
"I don't run LAHSA," she said, adding that she was the first mayor to sit on its board and that street homelessness has dropped since she took office. The latest official count for the city showed a 8% year to year jump in street homelessness.
Bass stepped off LAHSA’s governing commission last week, after LAist reported she had missed most of its meetings since she appointed herself to it in 2023. The mayor cited “time and all” as her reason for stepping down. She continues to appoint — and has the power to remove — half the commission’s members, including its current chair.
What happened at the hearing
Much of the hour-and-a-half hearing focused on Republican members’ criticism that Democrat-led cities distribute drug paraphernalia and don’t require unhoused people with addictions to get treatment as a condition of living in publicly funded housing.
Some proposals raised Tuesday would change how money reaches Los Angeles.
Burchett said he will introduce the Recovery First Housing Act, to require federally funded housing to offer substance abuse treatment. He has also introduced a bill restricting federal housing dollars to only support U.S. citizens.
LA's fights on a national stage
Burchett noted LAHSA’s audit committee chair, Justin Szlasa — who was proactive in rooting out wasteful spending — was demoted by Stephanie Graves, a Bass appointee who has declined to give her reason for doing so. The move was first reported by LAist.
Burchett also made claims that don’t hold up. He said 50,000 people are homeless in the city with "another 75,000" in the surrounding county. The latest official count found a total of 73,000 unhoused people across L.A. County — a figure that includes the city.
Burchett also said, “ LAHSA recently doled out funds to an L.A.-area nonprofit whose CEO had just been indicted for fraud.” LAist recently investigated LAHSA’s awarding of funds to that nonprofit, Abundant Blessings, and found no indication that LAHSA awarded it any funds after the fraud indictment. However, the review did find that long before the indictment, LAHSA kept awarding millions in contracts to the group even after it was flagged internally as high-risk for failing to do its job.
Burchett, however, was correct in saying “a court-ordered independent assessment of LAHSA's finances found alarming financial control weaknesses that leave the door open to rampant fraud.”
How to reach me
If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.
You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
Kavish Harjai
writes about how people get around L.A.
Published September 15, 2026 4:13 PM
On Sept. 15, advocates demanded action on traffic violence as vehicle collisions in LA are outpacing last year.
(
Kavish Harjai
/
LAist
)
Topline:
On Tuesday, street safety advocates and families of victims of vehicle collisions demanded Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declare a state of emergency on traffic violence in the city.
Why: Damian Kevitt, who leads Streets are for Everyone, said L.A. leaders are not prioritizing active transportation projects and equitable traffic enforcement that would make the city’s streets safer. An emergency declaration would make it easier for the city to coordinate resources to respond to traffic violence.
This year’s stats, so far: The city has seen an 8% increase in fatal traffic collisions this year compared to the same time last year, according to LAPD data from the end of August.
Read on … for more details about a draft executive order the mayor’s office was drafting earlier this year.
On Tuesday, street safety advocates and families of victims of vehicle collisions demanded that Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declare a state of emergency on traffic violence in the city.
Sandra Sanchez Loulakis’s son died last year after she said he was hit by a negligent driver.
“I’ve been struggling just to survive daily,” she said at the news conference organized by traffic safety nonprofit Streets are for Everyone. “This is what happens to a parent when they lose a child.”
The city has seen 8% more fatal traffic collisions this year than during the same period last year, according to LAPD data from the end of August.
Advocates said an emergency declaration would better coordinate resources to respond to traffic fatalities, which have exceeded the rate of homicides for the last three years.
“ This is not a matter of we don't know what to do,” Damian Kevitt, who leads Streets are for Everyone, said Tuesday. “This is a matter of we know exactly what to do. We’re just not making this a priority as a city.”
Kevitt said more than 1,250 people signed an open letter delivered to the mayor and L.A. City Council. One of the demands listed in the letter is for the city to restore transportation department staff.
Earlier this year, the city gave up $100 million in state grants to make streets safer because it did not have the personnel to complete the projects in compliance with state-mandated deadlines.
Draft executive directive on Vision Zero
It appears there had been momentum from the mayor’s office earlier this year to issue an executive directive recommitting the city to its Vision Zero goals of reducing traffic fatalities to zero.
According to emails from May shared with LAist, the mayor’s senior director of transportation told an activist that a draft executive directive was “under review” and expected to be released “within the next three weeks.”
LAist submitted a public records request for drafts of the executive directive, but on Sept. 14, the mayor’s office responded saying it could not disclose any records.
“[The records] include drafts and/or deliberative process for which the public interest served in nondisclosure clearly outweighs the public interest served by the disclosure,” the office said.
The mayor’s office has not responded to requests for comment about the draft executive directive.
How to reach me
If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.
You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
And if you're comfortable just reaching out by email I'm at kharjai@scpr.org
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Libby Rainey
has been tracking how L.A. is preparing for the 2028 Olympic Games.
Published September 15, 2026 4:09 PM
An aerial view of the city skyline of Los Angeles with the Los Angeles City Hall building in the foreground on July 13, 2010.
(
Tom Szczerbowski
/
Getty Images North America
)
Topline:
A new report commissioned by Olympics organizers estimates that the 2028 Games could generate at least $20 billion in economic output across Greater Los Angeles. A separate analysis submitted to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors in early September estimated that the Games would produce a total economic output of $19.2 billion in Los Angeles County alone.
What does the report commissioned by organizers say: The report projects that new economic activity across Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties could total between $20.5 billion and $25.4 billion and add between 126,000 and 152,000 jobs to the economy.
And the other report by the county: A separate analysis submitted to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors in early September laid out the potential uneven distribution of economic benefits to the region, including limited benefits for Olympic venue sites that are not tourist destinations and parts of Los Angeles being excluded from the Games altogether.
Read on… for details on the latest reports.
A new report commissioned by Olympics organizers estimates that the 2028 Games will generate at least $20 billion in economic output across Greater Los Angeles.
The analysis, prepared for LA28 by the nonprofit Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation’s Institute for Applied Economics, looked at the economic effects of L.A. hosting the Olympics and Paralympics. It includes organizing committee spending, capital investments, publicly funded transportation and security investments, and tourism.
In total, the report projects that new economic activity across Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties could total somewhere between $20.5 billion and $25.4 billion and add around 126,000 and 152,000 jobs to the economy.
A second less conservative methodology employed by the researchers estimates the overall economic output could be even higher, between $35.4 and $40.6 billion and up to 224,000 new jobs.
“ Together, they provide a responsible range, not an exaggerated promise,” Stephen Cheung, CEO of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation, said at a news conference announcing the report on Tuesday. “ If we work together with intention, the Games can leave Los Angeles with more than unforgettable memories. They can leave us with stronger businesses, greater opportunities, and a more connected regional economy.”
The report also estimates that around $5.7 billion of LA28’s spending will be in the five county region. LA28 has a $7.1 billion budget and has pledged to keep 75% of its spending in the Greater L.A. area, and put 25% toward small businesses.
“ That economic impact is going to be felt far and wide and across Los Angeles, as well as the Southern California region,” LA28 CEO Reynold Hoover said Tuesday.
The report is the second economic analysis forecasting the effects of the 2028 Games to come out this month. A separate report submitted to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors in early September estimated that the Games would produce more than $13 billion in direct spending and a total economic output of $19.2 billion in Los Angeles County alone.
The same report also laid out the potential uneven distribution of economic benefits to the region, including limited benefits for Olympic venue sites that are not tourist destinations and parts of Los Angeles being excluded from the Games altogether.
HR&A Advisors, the consultant group that put the report together, identified Carson, Pomona, the City of Industry and Exposition Park as locations that are hosting Olympic events, but that could end up being “passthrough areas.”
“Although these areas may be active during the day, they may struggle to capture spending from visitors who pass through but do not spend money outside the venue,” the report states.
The county report also questioned what economic benefits will flow to parts of L.A. County that will be disconnected from Olympic and Paralympic activities, like Antelope Valley and Southeast Los Angeles.
Meanwhile, the analysis found that L.A.’s typical tourist destinations — including downtown L.A., Old Town Pasadena, downtown Long Beach and the Venice Boardwalk — can expect to be active areas for economic activity during summer 2028.
CA becomes first state to pass new insurance rules
David Wagner
covers housing in Southern California, a place where the lack of affordable housing contributes to homelessness.
Published September 15, 2026 2:39 PM
Firefighters arrive at the scene as Eliot Arts Magnet Middle School burns during the Eaton fire in the Altadena area of Los Angeles county, California, on January 8, 2025.
(
Josh Edelson
/
AFP via Getty Images
)
Topline:
The Palisades and Eaton Fires last year destroyed thousands of homes in Los Angeles County. Thousands more were left standing, but choked with toxic fire residue. On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a package of bills that will make California the first state in the nation to establish smoke damage testing and cleaning standards for insurance companies.
The details: Assembly Bills 1642 and 1795 will require insurers to test for smoke damage, cover the cost of cleaning contaminants and keep paying for a homeowner’s alternative living expenses until the home is found to be safe to re-occupy. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control will have until the end of 2028 to develop testing and cleaning standards for lead and asbestos, and until the end of 2029 to set rules for heavy metals and other pollutants.
The backstory: According to the state, property owners filed 13,000 smoke damage claims for standing homes after the January 2025 fires. While insurers have covered testing and cleaning in many cases, other homeowners are still unable to return home as they battle with insurance companies over addressing smoke damage.
Read on… to learn how Altadena residents pushed for change, and what the insurance industry had to say about the bills.
The Palisades and Eaton Fires last year destroyed thousands of homes in Los Angeles County. Thousands more were left standing, but choked with toxic fire residue.
On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a package of bills that will make California the first state in the nation to establish smoke damage testing and cleaning standards for insurance companies.
Assembly Bills 1642 and 1795 will require insurers to test for smoke damage, cover the cost of cleaning contaminants, and keep paying for a homeowner’s alternative living expenses until the home is found safe to reoccupy.
The California Department of Toxic Substances Control will have until the end of 2028 to develop testing and cleaning standards for lead and asbestos, and until the end of 2029 to set rules for heavy metals and other pollutants.
Reaction to the bill
According to the state Department of Insurance, property owners filed 13,000 smoke damage claims for standing homes after the January 2025 fires. While insurers have covered testing and cleaning in many cases, other homeowners are still unable to return home as they battle with insurance companies over addressing smoke damage.
In a news release Tuesday, the governor and an author of one of the bills praised the changes to state law.
“These new protections will make insurer obligations clearer and give homeowners more financial flexibility when they need it most,” Newsom said.
Assemblymember John Harabedian said: “Science, not an insurance company’s opinions, will determine whether a home is safe.”
Insurance industry groups had opposed shifting rules and regulation away from the state Department of Insurance and to the Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Altadena residents pushed for change
Testing efforts by a group known as Eaton Fire Residents United found that lead, asbestos and heavy metals were still present in homes even after they were cleaned by professional remediation companies. Jane Lawton Potelle is the group’s executive director.
“California is leading the nation in how to recover safely after an urban wildfire,” she said in a news release about the laws’ passage.
Public health officials said smoke from the L.A. County fires was particularly toxic because it emanated from urban areas. The structures that burned often had lead paint and asbestos insulation.
The fires also destroyed cars, appliances and other human-made materials. This created more pollutants than smoke from fires in rural areas, which mainly burn through vegetation.
LAist covered the push to change smoke damage policies in a recent episode of our podcast Imperfect Paradise, which breaks down what these changes could mean for insurers, homeowners and how California adapts to climate change.