Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Detainees lack basics and healthcare, suit says
    A woman speaks into microphones at a podium, with several people standing behind her.
    Jeanette Zanipatin, policy director at CHIRLA, speaks at a news conference on Jan. 26, 2026.

    Topline:

    The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights announced a new lawsuit Monday against federal immigration agencies for claims detainees at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center lack basic necessities and medical care.

    Who is involved: Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and Public Counsel are assisting in the case against Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security.

    What they want to change: ”We're asking both that the judge force Adelanto, the detention facility, to ensure that basic medical care is being provided, that basic hygiene and sanitary conditions, food and water are provided, and that oversight is conducted over the facility,” said Alvaro Huerta, director of litigation and advocacy at Immigrant Defenders Law Center.

    A history of issues: In court documents, CHIRLA pointed to reports by government and nonprofit agencies that showed problems in previous years, including a DHS Office of Inspector General report from 2018 that found “a number of serious issues that violate ICE’s 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards and pose significant health and safety risks at the facility.”

    Read on ... for more about the lawsuit and the stories of two families whose loved ones died while detained at the facility.

    The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights announced a new lawsuit Monday against federal immigration agencies for claims of inhumane conditions at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center in San Bernardino County.

    The organization claims people detained in the Adelanto facility lack drinkable water, healthy food, clean clothes, places to sleep and access to medical care. Failing to provide these basic necessities, CHIRLA says in court documents, amounts to punishment — violating detainees rights to due process.

    “ We are really at a moment where we are seeing a human rights crisis right before our eyes,” CHIRLA policy director Jeanette Zanipatin said at a news conference Monday. “And the detention centers, especially the one at Adelanto, is where we are seeing it unfold in real time.”

    Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and Public Counsel are assisting in the case against Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security.

     ”We're asking both that the judge force Adelanto, the detention facility, to ensure that basic medical care is being provided, that basic hygiene and sanitary conditions, food and water are provided, and that oversight is conducted over the facility,” said Alvaro Huerta, director of litigation and advocacy at Immigrant Defenders Law Center.

    ICE and Homeland Security have not responded to LAist about the case or claims in this article.

    A question of constitutional rights

    When CHIRLA announced the lawsuit on Monday, Zanipatin said there has been “a long history of unsafe and abusive conditions” at the Adelanto facility. She referenced a July 2025 report from the nonprofit Disability Rights California that found conditions at the facility were “dangerous and inadequate for all people, especially for those with disabilities.”

    Court documents filed by CHIRLA also reference previous reports that found issues at the facility, including a 2018 report from the DHS Office of Inspector General that found “a number of serious issues that violate ICE’s 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards and pose significant health and safety risks at the facility.”

    Those issues included findings of nooses in detainees’ cells, improper use of disciplinary segregation and inadequate medical care.

    “Based on interviews with detainees and medical staff and a review of independent reports,” the report states, “we concluded that detainees do not have timely access to proper medical care.”

    CHIRLA claims in their lawsuit that Adelanto leadership rejected the findings of the inspector general report and took no corrective action.

    The concerns raised by CHIRLA as they announced the lawsuit closely resemble the findings of Disability Rights California, which also claimed detainees were not provided adequate medical care, food, water or clean clothing. The organization also reported that some people had limited access to communication with their loved ones.

    Huerta claimed that the conditions in the Adelanto facility are poor by design.

    “ Adelanto, like most ICE prisons, is engineered to be so punishing, so relentlessly soul crushing, that people abandon their rights and accept deportation even when they have strong asylum claims or a clear pathway to legal status,” Huerta said.

    He said 32 people died while detained by ICE nationwide in 2025, and at least 6 more have died in January. Two people died at Adelanto last fall, Huerta said.

    Family members speak out

    Mariel Garcia told LAist she would call her father, Gabriel Garcia-Aviles, nearly every day. That ended when he was detained by immigration agents in Costa Mesa on Oct. 14.

    Garcia-Aviles had a work permit, his daughter said, but he was detained and taken to Adelanto. She said she tried many times to ask the facility staff to allow her to call her father, or even to get an update on his condition, but she was never able to talk to him again.

    Worried, she said she got a call from the staff at Adelanto.

    “ They called me the day he was passing away,” Garcia told LAist, “They're like, go tell your family and friends to come and say their last goodbyes because your father's in critical condition.”

    Her brother, Gabriel Garcia, said that when they arrived at the hospital their father was intubated and “lifeless." Still, he said, there were law enforcement officers standing outside the hospital room.

    Garcia-Aviles died Oct. 23 at age 56.

    Jose Ayala also talked about the loss of his brother, Ismael Ayala-Uribe, while he was detained in the Adelanto facility.

    “ He was there for about a month and we knew nothing of his condition,” Ayala said at Monday’s press conference, “just that he was sick and that he wasn't getting any help when he asked.”

    Ayala said his family learned of his brother’s death when the police came and knocked at their door. He said staff at Adelanto did not tell them Ayala-Uribe had been hospitalized or that he needed a surgery, which ICE said in a news release was for an abscess.

    Ayala told LAist that he was able to talk with his brother over the phone a couple of times when he was detained, and Ayala-Uribe was joking with him about the poor conditions of the facility causing him to lose weight.

    “ One of the last things he told me,” Ayala recalled, “was, ‘We'll see who comes out skinnier.’”

    He said his brother was 39 when he died on Sept. 22, 2025.

    CHIRLA alleges in court documents that staff at Adelanto were aware Ayala-Uribe was having a potentially life-threatening medical emergency three days before his death, but he was taken back to his cell after being seen by the facility’s medical team.

    An ICE news release said Ayala-Uribe “was evaluated by an on-call medical provider Sept. 18, provided medication, and returned to his dormitory,” but did not mention the severity of his condition.

    The cause of both deaths remain under investigation, CHIRLA said in an accompanying news release.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is  jrynning.56.

  • More California students admitted
    A large brick outdoor staircase surrounded by grassy knolls with light poles with hanging blue signs that read "#1/UCLA." Various students wearing backpacks go up and down the stairs.
    Students at UCLA on the Janss steps.

    Topline:

    The University of California announced Wednesday they have offered admissions to a record number of California students. Around 102,000 residents were offered seats, around 1,400 more than last year. UC also admitted around 29,400 California community college transfers, another record high, officials said.

    What that looks like in SoCal: In Southern California, UCLA offered seats to 57% of California residents who applied, UC Irvine 52% and UC Riverside 87%. Around 2,500 admitted California students at UCLA are first generation college students.

    Why it matters: UCs increasing California student admissions is tied to a deal the university system struck with lawmakers. The deal, UC’s Multi Year Compact, requires UCs to increase in-state students by 1% every year and make it easier for community college students to transfer in. In turn, the state would increase its funding to UCs to make up for the loss of revenue from non-state students – about a 5% increase every year. The University of California has said it's on track to meet that goal.

    University of California officials announced Wednesday they have offered admission to a record number of California students. Around 102,000 residents were offered seats, about 1,400 more than last year. UC also admitted about 29,400 California community college transfers, another record high, officials said.

    In Southern California, UCLA offered seats to 57% of California residents who applied, UC Irvine 52% and UC Riverside 87%. Around 2,500 of the admitted California students at UCLA are first-generation college students.

    “For generations, a University of California education has been one of the state’s most powerful engines of social mobility, opening doors for talented students from every background and region of the state,” said UC President James B. Milliken. “The record number of California students we’re welcoming this year reflects UC's enduring commitment to expanding opportunity while preparing the next generation of leaders, innovators, educators and public servants."

    UC has also increased its offer of admissions to out-of-state students and international students.

    Why it matters

    UCs increasing California student admissions is tied to a deal the university system struck with lawmakers after facing increased complaints from parents and students that the top UC schools — UCLA, UC Berkeley and UC San Diego — were so hard to get into.

    The deal, UC’s Multi-Year Compact, requires UCs to increase in-state students by 1% every year and make it easier for community college students to transfer. In turn, the state would increase its funding to UCs to make up for the loss of revenue from non-state students — about a 5% increase every year.

    The University of California has said it's on track to meet that goal.

    Race and ethnicity in admissions

    Earlier this year, the Justice Department accused UCLA of “intentionally” selecting students based on their race, favoring Black and Latino students. This is part of a larger trend of the Department of Justice pursuing legal action against the University of California in President Donald Trump’s second term, including suing UCLA over allegations that the university allowed antisemitism on campus. The Justice Department also unsuccessfully demanded a range of concessions to bring UCLA more in line with its ideology, in addition to more than $1 billion in fines. The administration also tried to freeze the university’s research funding, prompting an effort to have the state of California be a backstop.

    But admission trends in race stayed mostly the same as in previous years.

    Around 6% of California students offered admissions at UC identify as Black, proportional to the state’s Black population, while around 38% of the in-state admitted students are Latino. Around 40% of the state’s population is Latino.

    Around 18% of the in-state students offered admissions identified as white and 33% Asian.

  • Sponsored message
  • City requires action at ‘coyote condo’
    A screenshot of a news broadcast that shows a coyote standing on a wood frame foundation looking down toward the camera. The CBS news Los Angeles logo is in view.
    The coyotes recently showed up at an abandoned construction site.

    Topline:

    A pack of coyotes has taken over an abandoned condo project in West Hollywood. Now, the city is stepping in.

    Where are they? The urban canines are near the corner of North Spaulding Avenue and Romaine Street. The residential construction project wasn’t finished, so they’ve been seen exploring the wood frames.

    What’s next: Residents have complained about the coyotes and their late-night howling. So, the city is requiring the property owner to bring in an expert.

    Read on…. to learn more about what could happen.

    We’ve all had a problem neighbor at one time or another, but what if they howled at the moon?

    That’s what West Hollywood is dealing with right now at a so-called “coyote condo,” where a pack has taken over a construction site, leading to complaints from residents.

    Now, officials are making the property owner take action.

    How we got here

    Coyotes often show up in Southern California’s urban areas looking for food, but these ones are sticking around.

    The pack is squatting in an unfinished site near the corner of North Spaulding Avenue and Romaine Street.

    The area was supposed to become a 22-unit condominium building, according to the city. However, construction stopped in 2024 and permits have since expired.

    The roughly 19,500-square-foot lot is fenced off. Neighbors have reported coyotes traversing the bare wood frames, though it’s unclear if they’ve caused any other problems besides being a nuisance.

    What’s next

    West Hollywood said its Neighborhood and Business Safety Division is in touch with the owner’s representative.

    “As with any privately owned property, the owner is responsible for maintaining the site,” the city said in a statement.

    Officials are requiring the owner to “promptly” retain a wildlife control operator that specializes in humane wildlife management. That expert is tasked with assessing and recommending next steps, so it’s still unclear how the coyote problem will be dealt with.

    The city of West Hollywood follows a coyote coexistence plan, which only recommends lethal action for unprovoked human attacks. Wild animal relocation is also generally illegal under state regulations because moving them can disrupt local ecosystems and spread disease.

    However, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife can give written permission to relocate coyotes under certain circumstances. The city says it will update residents on its website as new information becomes available.

    In the meantime, don’t feed the coyotes and take caution when you’re in the area. Keep pets on a leash and indoors, if you live close. Coyotes are known to attack small animals. Young children can also get targeted, but it’s less common.

    You can learn more about how these urban canines live in our coyote guide.

    Listen 49:07
    Listen: The Coyote Villain
    If the mountain lion is thought of as a celebrity, then, many would think of the coyote as a villain. LAist looked into why we vilify coyotes, what scientists actually know about them, and how they’ve adapted and thrived in some of the most urban parts of Southern California.

    Things to keep in mind

    Here's the food-related advice in West Hollywood's Coyote Management and Coexistence Plan:

    • Never hand-feed or otherwise deliberately feed a coyote
    • Avoid feeding pets outside
    • Remove sources of pet food and water. If feeding pets outside is necessary, remove the bowl and any leftover food promptly.
    • Never compost any meat or dairy (unless the compost is fully secured)
    • Maintain good housekeeping, such as regularly raking areas around bird feeders, to help discourage coyote activity near residences.
    • Remove fallen fruit from the ground.
    • Keep trash in high-quality containers with tight-fitting lids. Only place the cans curbside the morning of collection. If you leave out overnight, trash cans are more likely to be tipped over and broken into. Bag especially attractive food wastes such as meat scraps or leftover pet food. If it is several days before garbage will be picked up, freeze temporarily or take to a dumpster or other secure storage contain

  • City must rehire officer fired four years ago
    Two photos side by side. Left photo shows a man standing in a courtroom, wearing a blue suit and burgundy and grey striped tie. Right photo shows a man, standing in a courtroom,  wearing a grey suit and tie with his hands folded in front of him.
    Former LBPD officers Dedier Reyes (left) and David Salcedo seen during the opening of their 2023 trial at Clara Shortridge Foltz Courthouse on charges of falsifying a police report.

    Topline:

    A state appeals court has ruled that Long Beach must rehire an officer it fired four years ago after he was accused of lying in official reports.

    The backstory: The city fired Reyes in 2022, shortly after he was charged with one count of filing a false police report and one count of perjury for allegedly lying about his observations during a 2018 gun arrest. A jury ultimately acquitted Reyes and his less-experienced partner, Officer David Salcedo. But the charges, the city’s firing of the two officers and the criminal trial that followed, cast doubt on their credibility. As a result, prosecutors dropped dozens of cases where the two made arrests or would’ve needed to testify to make the case. Reyes, who was training Salcedo, was accused of lying and perjuring himself when he wrote in a February 2018 police report that he recognized two gang members standing outside a Long Beach taqueria and then saw one go inside and leave a bag containing a gun.

    The ruling: The unanimous decision from the three-judge panel upholds a previous ruling from a city employment panel and a lower court. After reviewing all of the evidence, the three-judge appeals panel sided with Reyes on Monday. They found it plausible that he mistakenly recalled the events leading up to the 2018 arrest and noted that the city “identified no apparent motive” for him to falsify the police report, according to their ruling.

    What's next: Monday’s ruling means Long Beach owes Reyes more than four years of pay he has missed since his dismissal, and the city must offer him a job with the police department that is on par with his previous position as a patrol officer.

    A state appeals court ruled Monday that Long Beach must rehire an officer it fired four years ago after he was accused of lying in official reports.

    The unanimous decision from the three-judge panel upholds a previous ruling from a city employment panel and a lower court. It also brings an end to a roughly five-year legal saga during which the city filed two appeals in an attempt to keep former Long Beach police Officer Dedier Reyes off the force, even at a time when the department has struggled to fill vacancies.

    Long Beach City Attorney Dawn McIntosh said she was “disappointed” by Monday’s decision by the appeals court, but said her office does not plan to file any further appeals.

    Monday’s ruling means Long Beach owes Reyes more than four years of pay he has missed since his dismissal, and the city must offer him a job with the police department that is on par with his previous position as a patrol officer. Records from Transparent California show Reyes’ base salary was $121,948 in his last full year at the LBPD.

    The city fired Reyes in 2022, shortly after he was charged with one count of filing a false police report and one count of perjury for allegedly lying about his observations during a 2018 gun arrest. A jury ultimately acquitted Reyes and his less-experienced partner, Officer David Salcedo.

    But the charges, the city’s firing of the two officers and the criminal trial that followed, cast doubt on their credibility. As a result, prosecutors dropped dozens of cases where the two made arrests or would’ve needed to testify to make the case.

    Reyes, who was training Salcedo, was accused of lying and perjuring himself when he wrote in a February 2018 police report that he recognized two gang members standing outside a Long Beach taqueria and then saw one go inside and leave a bag containing a gun.

    Surveillance video from the taqueria made internal affairs investigators question how Reyes could have seen what was happening inside the restaurant and also showed he arrested the wrong gang member for allegedly carrying the bag with the gun.

    Reyes later told internal affairs investigators that he “made a mistake in this police report,” according to an interview transcript from a separate civil lawsuit.

    Reyes and Salcedo continued working and weren’t criminally accused for nearly four years after the incident. Then-District Attorney Jackie Lacey reviewed the case and decided it didn’t merit charges, but when George Gascón became the new District Attorney in 2021 — after making police reform central to his campaign — he brought charges against the officers.

    After their acquittal on the criminal charges, a city employment panel ruled they must be rehired, but Long Beach sued to try to block that decision.

    After reviewing all of the evidence, the three-judge appeals panel sided with Reyes on Monday. They found it plausible that he mistakenly recalled the events leading up to the 2018 arrest and noted that the city “identified no apparent motive” for him to falsify the police report, according to their ruling.

    When the city fired Reyes, it noted that he had racked up 14 use-of-force reviews and 11 citizen complaints since 2010, according to court documents. But the department determined that all of those uses of force were within policy and none of the citizen complaints were determined to have merit, the court noted in its ruling.

    Long Beach has, however, been sued twice over Reyes’ alleged misconduct, resulting in payouts of $550,000 and $499,800.

    After Monday’s ruling, Reyes will have the option of rejoining LBPD.

    Salcedo has already been rehired and assigned to work patrol, LBPD Executive Communications Officer Allison Gallagher wrote in an email last October.

  • 95-cent pastrami sandwiches mark the milestone
    Canter's Deli's neon sign glows above Fairfax Avenue at dusk, reading "Restaurant," "Open 24 Hours," and "Bakery," with palm trees and passing car lights in the foreground.
    Canter's neon sign has glowed over Fairfax Avenue since the family moved the deli there in 1953, and this week, the LA institution is celebrating 95 years in business.

    Topline:

    Canter's Deli turns 95 this year, and the iconic Jewish deli and coffee shop will sell its hot pastrami sandwich — with coleslaw, pickle, and chocolate chip rugelach — for 95 cents.

    Why it matters: The Fairfax institution has been feeding Angelenos since 1953, serving everyone from the neighborhood's Jewish community to the Supreme-loving skate punks who arrived decades later. Co-owner Marc Canter, the third-generation owner, put it best: Canter's is the place where "grandkids grow up and bring their grandkids."

    Why 95 cents? Canter says the price is purely symbolic of the anniversary, not the actual cost — they charged 50 cents for the 50th anniversary and 75 cents for the 75th.

    Read on ... to find the details and to learn about the history of Canter's ...

    Canter's Deli turns 95 this year, and the iconic Jewish deli and coffee shop will sell its hot pastrami sandwich — with coleslaw, pickle and chocolate chip rugelach — for 95 cents.

    Is there a catch?

    No. But dine-in only, limit one per customer.

    I don’t eat meat

    Lucky you — a plant-based corned beef substitute is available.

    Canter's 95-cent pastrami birthday special

    Canter's Deli, 419 N Fairfax Ave, Los Angeles
    Monday, August 3, 6 p.m.-midnight
    Dine-in only

    Why it matters

    The Fairfax institution has been feeding Angelenos since 1953, serving everyone from the neighborhood's Jewish community to the Supreme-loving skate punks who arrived decades later.

    Co-owner Marc Canter, the third-generation owner, put it best: Canter's is the place where "grandkids grow up and bring their grandkids."

    Why 95 cents?

    Canter says the price is purely symbolic of the anniversary, not the actual cost — they charged 50 cents for the 50th anniversary and 75 cents for the 75th.

    The history

    Now three generations deep, the family has logged roughly 159 years combined behind the counter: Canter's grandfather, about 50; his father, about 65; and Marc himself, 44 and counting.

    The sprawling namesake business started in 1931, when Marc Canter’s grandparents sold corned beef sandwiches off a cart in Jersey City before landing in Boyle Heights on Brooklyn Avenue (now César Chávez Avenue).

    Canter said his Aunt Selma struck out on her own in 1948 at age 23 and moved the business to Fairfax. Her parents joined her there in 1953. One current employee has been on staff since 1964 — 62 years and counting.

    Despite the neighborhood's changes, Canter's hasn't: No remodels, no menu overhauls. The matzo ball soup, potato pancakes, and cheese blintzes have never left.

    "The ancestors are watching from above," Canter said, "so you have to keep [going] to make them proud."