Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
New plan looks to close the LA River when bacteria spikes

Ever since kayakers began paddling down the Los Angeles River in 2010, public officials have faced a problem: how to encourage the revitalization of the river while also protecting the health of people who boat and fish in its waters?
On Wednesday, an L.A. city council committee got closer to finding a solution when it voted to adopt a protocol of how to close the river and notify the public when when fecal bacteria levels exceed safety standards.
The vote came nearly six months after at least five government agencies failed to notify the public when, in advance of a kayaking race on the river in early September 2017, E.coli levels spiked to 100 times the federal safety limit for swimming and recreation. Instead, it fell to an environmental group, Heal the Bay, to send out a press release and media alert about the poor water quality.
Since then, L.A. Sanitation, which is part of the City of Los Angeles, has been developing a plan to do more water quality testing in the Elysian Valley and Sepulveda Basin recreation areas during the summer months, and to warn river users when bacteria levels rise. Ingesting water contaminated with fecal bacteria can cause diarrhea and vomiting.
The first version of the plan, which L.A. Sanitation unveiled in October 2017, would have closed the river to boating when bacteria levels exceed 576 per 100 milliliters in a single location. The level is twice the federal safety limit for swimming or other activities where ingestion of water is likely.
But it was rejected by L.A. City Councilman Mitch O’Farrell for being developed too hastily and without enough consultation from kayaking groups, who could lose business if the L.A. River were closed due to high bacteria levels. If the protocol had been in place during summer 2017, the river would have been closed four times due to poor water quality, according to emails obtained by KPCC.
“A lot of us believe the water in the L.A. River is safe to navigate in a kayak,” O’Farrell said in a November meeting of the Arts, Parks and River Committee.
The revised plan, adopted at a Wednesday meeting of the committee, seeks a compromise between closing the river too often and keeping it open when bacteria levels are so high people could get sick. Now, for the river to be closed, water samples taken at two or more sites in the recreation zones would have to exceed 576 per 100 milliliters, instead of at just one. River closure notices will be posted online and on social media by L.A. Sanitation, and physically in the river recreation zones by the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority. It remained unclear though whether gates to the river would be locked.
Environmentalists and river recreation advocates were mostly pleased at the adoption of the protocol, although some thought it could be stricter and urged the city to focus on cleaning up the river, not just notifying people when it’s dirty.
“The protocol is good for communicating information to the public, but in terms of actually doing the work of cleaning it up and making it safe, we’re still a long way from there,” said Stephen Mejia, the policy and advocacy manger of the Friends of the Los Angeles River.
If approved by the full city council, the new plan is scheduled to take effect on Memorial Day weekend, the start of the summer kayaking season.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.