Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

State Senate committee examines San Bruno gas explosion

A couple walks by homes that were destroyed by fire following a deadly gas main explosion on September 13, 2010 in San Bruno, California.
A couple walks by homes that were destroyed by fire following a deadly gas main explosion on September 13, 2010 in San Bruno, California.
(
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 2:13
State Senate committee examines San Bruno gas explosion
State Senate committee examines San Bruno gas explosion

A joint State Senate committee met Tuesday in Sacramento to figure out what could have prevented the deadly gas line explosion in San Bruno. Eight people died when the line burst and set fire to 37 homes.

Lawmakers want to tighten oversight of the tens of thousands of feet of natural gas pipeline in California.

Rene Morales told senators at a joint hearing of committees on Energy, Utilities and Public Safety that her daughter Jessica was watching a football game with her boyfriend Joe when the pipeline exploded – and engulfed his house in flames.

"Jessica did make it out of that house and she ran for her life," said Morales. "Unfortunately she was separated from Joe and she couldn’t make it out. She ran for cover in a shed to the house next door and that’s where she perished."

Pacific Gas and Electric owns the pipeline that ruptured. But the senators wanted to know what the state Public Utilities Commission – the pipeline regulator – could have done to prevent the explosion.

They asked how the commission could approve a PG&E rate increase to pay to replace the pipeline, but not follow up to see if the work was done. It wasn’t. PG&E postponed it.

L.A. Democrat Alex Padilla asked Commission chief Richard Clark to explain. "At this point," said Padilla, "we are letting the utility unilaterally decide, 'No, these projects have now become important from one year to the next and we’re going to shift the money.' Is that correct?"

Sponsored message

"That’s correct," said Clark.

The Public Utilities Commission learned three years ago that the pipeline was slated for replacement – but didn’t keep track of whether that happened.

San Francisco Bay Area senator Mark Leno asked Commissioner Richard Clark if that indicates a problem. "With hindsight," said Leno, "with information filed on record with CPUC going back to 2007, is there anything the PUC might have done differently that could have potentially prevented this from happening?"

"Boy, I, I, I don’t know how we could have prevented this from happening, sir," said Clark after a pause. "Because I tell you, if we could, I would have. Absolutely. But I don’t know how we could have prevented this from happening."

The Public Utilities Commission employs nine people to inspect hundreds of miles of natural gas pipeline. That’s where the hearing came full circle. State lawmakers – not the Public Utilities Commission set the limit on the number of inspectors.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today