With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
MWD to debate its stake in $17B Delta water tunnels project
Listen
• 0:57
The Metropolitan Water District, which supplies imported water for Southern Californians, will be debating the $17 billion Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta project.
(
Don Barrett via Flickr Creative Commons
)
A proposal to build giant water tunnels under the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta suffered a setback last week when a key partner that was expected to help fund a big slice of the $17 billion project voted to pull out.
That leaves the Metropolitan Water District — which supplies imported water for 19 million Southern Californians — to decide whether it should fund its $4 billion share of the project known as the California Water Fix.
The plan would route Northern California water from the Sacramento/San Joaquin Rivers under the delta in big tunnels, delivering it to the north end of the California Aqueduct for its journey to Southern California. Now, the water flows across the delta, causing environmental problems. Proponents say the tunnels would improve the delta habitat.
Metropolitan Water District brings in water from Northern California and the Colorado River, and wholesales it to 26 cities and water agencies. Those agencies would pass on the cost of the project to their ratepayers, which MWD estimates would add about $2 to $3 to households' monthly water bills.
Support for LAist comes from
But voting to fund the project is a tougher decision because the nation’s biggest irrigation district, the Fresno-based Westlands Water District, voted Sept. 19 to not participate.
Westlands was expected to cover 26 percent of the project, a $4 billion portion equal to MWD’s proposed slice. It is unclear how Westlands’ portion of the project would be covered.
MWD General Manager Jeffrey Kightlinger said the board on Tuesday is scheduled to debate whether to commit to its portion of the project.
"It's both cheap efficient and highly reliable and, in our view, a smart investment as an insurance policy for Southern California's water supply future, Kightlinger said. "[It's] like any big, controversial project, so the board may choose not to do it."
The MWD board is scheduled to vote Oct. 10 on the project.
Opponents of the tunnel project say it would not provide substantial new supplies of water to Southern California and that the cost per household would be higher than what the MWD estimates. They say the region's money would be better invested in projects that capture storm runoff and recycle wastewater.
"They do not fix California's water problems," said Adam Scow of Food & Water Watch. The environmental advocacy group has been speaking against the tunnels project at the meetings of some cities whose appointees serve on MWD's governing board.
Support for LAist comes from
He said the tunnels would cost billions of dollars and raise the water rates of families already stressed by utility bills.
"They do not provide additional water for Los Angeles when Los Angeles needs to spend and prioritize public dollars on fixing the breaking water mains, cleaning up local groundwater, and investing in water recycling," Scow said.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Immigration raids have caused some U.S. citizens to carry their passports to the store, to school or to work. But what documents to have on you depends on your citizenship. -
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million. -
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high.
Best of LAist