Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

McCourts' post-nuptial attorney tesitfies

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:57
McCourts' post-nuptial attorney tesitfies
McCourts' post-nuptial attorney tesitfies

The Boston attorney who prepped the McCourts’ post-nuptial agreement began his testimony yesterday in the couple’s L.A. divorce trial. He's the attorney who set off a legal battle when he tried to fix an apparent mistake.

Some copies of the McCourts’ post-nuptial agreement say Frank is the sole owner of the Dodgers. Others say the ballclub belongs to Frank and his soon-to-be-ex-wife Jamie.

Attorney Larry Silverstein prepared the papers; he said in court that he doesn’t recall doing it – but he must have flipped the word “inclusive” with “exclusive” on some copies. That put the team in Frank’s hands; his attorneys say that was the intent of the agreement.

If the Dodger deal went bad, the McCourts’ homes would be safe from creditors because they were in Jamie’s hands. But Jamie insists she wanted a stake in the ballclub.

Her attorney, David Boies, peppered Silverstein with questions about why he changed a signed and notarized document. His answer: it’s OK to fix errors “in certain circumstances.”

So why didn’t he tell Jamie McCourt he’d changed a key word? She didn’t know about it for almost six years. Silverstein conceded that “on reflection,” it would have been “better practice” to tell her back then that he’d flipped those words.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today