Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LAUSD rejects Miramonte students' claim for more compensation

Miramonte Elementary School is the center of a scandal where two teachers have been accused of engaging in lewd acts with students.
Miramonte Elementary School is the center of a scandal where teacher Mark Berndt was accused of engaging in lewd acts on students.
(
Grant Slater/KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:51
LAUSD rejects Miramonte students' claim for more compensation

Officials at the Los Angeles Unified School District rejected a claim from a lawyer arguing his 58 students ensnarled in the Miramonte sex abuse scandal are owed millions more than they received in their settlement.

Paul Kiesel, the students' attorney, claims his clients were shortchanged in the $30 million settlement reached in 2013 because another group of Miramonte families received $139 million last fall. The sum was the largest payout of its kind in district history.

More than 100 students and parents sued the district after authorities charged former Miramonte Elementary School teacher Mark Berndt with 23 counts of committing lewd acts, including feeding students cookies laced with semen. Berndt is serving 25 years in prison. 

The district's claims coordinator, Toni Tosello, said the agreement prohibits those who settled early from suing LAUSD again. 

"They now want to back out of their deal and get more money because other claimants, nearly two years later, in radically different circumstances, after more than 100 depositions were taken, negotiated for more money as trial of their cases was to begin," Tosello wrote in a March 27 letter to Kiesel's firm. After a public records request, the district released the letter to KPCC in late April.

Kiesel argues the early settlement included a "most favored nation clause," which would entitle his clients to compensation greater than or equal to later settlements.

"You want to make sure all children who were abused in a similar fashion are similarly situated and treated fairly," said Raymond Boucher, an attorney who with Kiesel represented students in the earlier settlement.

Sponsored message

Since the district rejected their claim, Boucher said he will ask court mediators to again intervene. 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right