Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA Times is leaving downtown Los Angeles for El Segundo. Will it be forever?

Marking a new era, The Los Angeles Times will move out of its historic location in downtown L.A., the incoming owner told staff at a meeting Friday.
Patrick Soon-Shiong told gathered staff that the Times' headquarters will move to El Segundo to gasps.
Carolina Miranda, an arts columnist for the Times, tweeted that Soon-Shiong said he had failed to come to terms with the developer who owns the building. Two years ago, Tribune Media sold the complex to the Onni Group, a Canadian developer with plans to use it for offices, shops and residential units.
https://twitter.com/cmonstah/status/984853308610306048
The Times will move from downtown when its current lease expires on June 30.
By later in the day, it seemed unclear how temporary the move really would be.
https://twitter.com/HawthorneCDOLA/status/984895759853092864
https://twitter.com/mattdpearce/status/984894011218378752
The Times reported that "the new campus would include an eight-floor building with 120,000 square feet of space. A museum of The Times’ 136-year history would be housed on the first floor, along with event and retail space. Soon-Shiong’s wife, Michele, is leading the design of the space."
The proposed campus is under construction. Soon-Shiong owns several properties in El Segundo, the newspaper reported. The Chan Soon-Shiong Institute for Medicine, for example, is located near the junction of the 105 and 405 freeways.
The complex downtown is known as Times-Mirror Square. The oldest of the buildings at 1st and Spring opened in 1935. That was 25 years after an earlier L.A. Times building located across the street was bombed by union activists, killing 21 people.
That current headquarters, kitty-corner from L.A.'s City Hall, is noted for its art deco exterior and distinctive Globe Lobby.
There had been speculation among newsroom staff — still the largest in the West — for several years about a possible move to a westside location. A proposal by Tronc, the current owner of the Times, became a point of contention in the lead up to a successful campaign to unionize the newsroom.
https://twitter.com/mattdpearce/status/951241169605820417
In January, members of the L.A. Times Guild Organizing Committee argued downtown is "the most central location to many of the communities and institutions that are vital to our daily reporting, including city, county, state and several federal government offices."
At the time, newsroom union organizers said Tronc was also exploring moving the paper's staff to another downtown location: Aon Center, a skyscraper at the corner of Hope Street and Wilshire Boulevard. Union organizers expressed concerns about that plan, too, saying it called for journalists working in cramped quarters.
Many in the newsroom had been concerned about relocation anywhere outside of downtown. Why? Well:
https://twitter.com/kyoshino/status/984867151965110273
In their January letter, union organizers — then concerned about a move to Santa Monica — said a move to the westside would lengthen the average commute time for "nearly 90 percent of the staff."
Soon-Shiong had scheduled the Friday town hall where he made the announcement prior to a report appearing in the New York Post late Thursday that suggested talks to close the Times sale had stalled. Soon-Shiong said the Post report was not true.
UPDATES:
1:30 p.m.: This articles was updated with information about previous proposals to move The Times.
3:40 p.m.: Additional information about the planned El Segundo campus was added to this story.
This article originally published at 11:40 a.m.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.