Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Los Angeles teachers union seeks to re-negotiate evaluation system

The union representing teachers in the Los Angeles Unified School District wants to re-work how the district rates teachers' job performance.
It's one of two portions of the labor contract between the district that United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) leaders proposed to re-open for negotiations Tuesday.
The proposal could spell more change for the district's teacher evaluation system, which the union says has been in "transition" in recent years.
In Dec. 2014, a public employment review board ruled the district — under then-Superintendent John Deasy — erred in unilaterally changing the evaluation system and ordered the district to stop using it.
Then, as part of the contract agreement between the union and the district reached last April, both sides agreed to convene committees to study L.A. Unified's evaluation scheme and consider changes.
UTLA president Alex Caputo-Pearl said his union's members want to see more professional development for teachers.
"We also want to see more supports like mentor teachers, which the research says — very broadly across the country — are effective in helping folks who are struggling," he said.
The union also proposed re-negotiating the portion of its contract that covers class sizes.
Caputo-Pearl says he hopes the district and union can agree to new terms before the start of the 2016-17 school year. The sides are currently looking for dates to begin negotiations on the two provisions.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.