Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
For homeless recyclers, center closures mean loss of income
Local recycling centers are disappearing in California, and that's hurting the small armies of people who make their living hunting through bins and scouring curbs for recyclables to turn in for cash.
Over 300 recycling centers across the state have closed in the past year, according to CalRecycle, the state agency that promotes recycling. The issue: the price the state reimburses centers for cans and bottles has dropped, making it an unsustainable business.
At A1 Electronics Recycling in South Los Angeles, owner Anthony Collins said he hasn't thought about shutting down, but he did stop accepting bottles and cans about four months ago because it's not economically viable.
“If you’re talking about rent, if you’re talking about power, you talking about any forklifts or anything you have to use, and also the employees, you’re not making enough money to properly sustain,” Collins said.
That's sent regular customers, like Heshimu Coleman, scrambling for a new recycling center.
Coleman, who lives in a tent down the street from A1, has had a hard time getting a good job. He’d been in and out of prison and institutions for over 20 years. To make money, he started recycling: cans, bottles, electronics, and anything else he could find wandering up and down the streets.
“It’s free money to go out and get as you please, you just have to have the hustle and the will about yourself to go out and go get it,” Coleman said. “It’s just like a job ... I'm like my own boss”
Coleman would go to A1 to turn in cans and bottles that he collected, and A1 would pay him on the spot. On an average day, he’d make about $60. On a good day, he’d make over $100.
Afterwards, A1 would pass the plastic and aluminum goods to the state to be recycled, and CalRecycle would reimburse the center with a subsidy through the beverage container program.
Though the back of a can might advertise a 5-cent redemption fee, recycling centers generally pay people bringing in more than 50 cans by weight. And in turn the state's rate to recycling centers is based on a formula, which takes into account prices of plastic and aluminum. Over the past four years, the values of those commodities has dropped. As a result, the state is paying less for the recycled cans and bottles.
The difference between what A1's Collins paid street recyclers like Coleman and the amount he got from the state was so large, he was losing money, so he stopped utilizing the program.

Now, Coleman still recycles, but he has to travel five times as far to get to the nearest open center. He doesn’t have a car, so he brings his bags of goods by bike.
“Man, it’s a long way to go,” Coleman said. “Especially in the summertime.”
That means less time spent collecting recyclables, and ultimately, less income.
Container Recycling Institute president Susan Collins said she mapped the remaining recycling centers and determined that the areas of Marina del Rey, Long Beach, and Venice are what she calls "recycling deserts" or "redemption deserts," or areas without recycling centers.
"I hope that the troubles that we are experiencing here in California don't give someone a negative impression of the law or the program as a whole," CRI's Collins said. "It's really just about changing and updating a formula so these folks get paid. It's that simple."
CalRecycle spokesman Mark Oldfield said that the formula, which is written into a state statute, has been giving recycling centers increased subsidies in the two most recent quarters.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.