Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Following Riverside, more Dorner reward donors consider withdrawing pledges

Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck, center, talks about the $1 million reward for accused killer and fired Los Angeles police officer, Christopher Dorner as Los Angeles Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa, left, and Irvine, Calif., Mayor Steven Choi look on during a new conference at the Los Angeles police department in Los Angeles, Sunday, Feb. 10, 2013.
Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck, center, talks about the $1 million reward for accused killer and fired Los Angeles police officer, Christopher Dorner as Los Angeles Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa, left, and Irvine, Calif., Mayor Steven Choi look on during a new conference at the Los Angeles police department in Los Angeles, Sunday, Feb. 10, 2013.
(
Chris Carlson/AP
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 2:19
Following Riverside, more Dorner reward donors consider withdrawing pledges

The million dollar-plus reward for Christopher Dorner was the biggest local reward offered in U.S. history.

But now the bounty is shrinking, with at least one donor refusing to pay - and others reconsidering their pledges.

More than 35 donors made the reward a record setter, but each of those contributors had their own stipulations for what would merit a payout.

Even Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and LAPD Chief Charlie Beck—who have both said the reward should be paid out—seemed to be on different pages when they announced the bounty in February.

Villaraigosa said the reward would given for information leading to the “capture” of Dorner, while Beck said it was for the ex-LAPD officer's “capture and conviction.”

At the time, no one appeared to notice the distinction—but now it could turn out to be crucial.

The city of Riverside says it won’t pay its $100,000 portion of the reward because its guidelines require information that leads to an “arrest and conviction.”

Sponsored message

“These conditions were not met,” said Riverside mayor William Bailey in a statement. “The intent of a reward is always to encourage new information from the public that may otherwise not come to the investigation and investigators without such a reward.”

The Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC)—a Sacramento-based law enforcement lobbying group-may back out of its reward pledge, too.
 
“The original wording and the wording that I sent out to get my board of directors to approve the award was for the arrest and conviction of Christopher Dorner," said Ron Cottingham, president of PORAC. “Obviously there was no arrest or conviction.”

Cottingham is polling his board to determine if PORAC should still pay its portion of the reward. He said he had heard from other donors who were considering withdrawing.

But USC has indicated it will honor it reward pledge, and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors—which voted on its reward a day after Dorner died—says it will do the same. Board chairman John Benoit says Riverside County wanted to show solitary with law enforcement.

“Knowing there might not ever be a conviction, we actually altered the wording of the standard reward to remove the conviction from the apprehension and conviction criteria," said Benoit.

More than 35 donors chipped in money for the reward—from AEG to the Dodgers to the FBI. Chief Beck says the city is in touch with all them to determine who still wants to pay up.

“We’ll be able to dispatch what reward remains,” Beck told reporters Tuesday. “I know the mayor is still committed and so am I.”

Sponsored message

Beck says he still thinks the reward can be paid out quickly. But first the city has to figure out another tricky question: Who gets the money?

Two claims have been filed: one by the Big Bear couple tied up by Dorner, and another by the man whose pickup truck he stole.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today