Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Ethics watchdog group wants more transparency in Maxine Waters case

File photo: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) holds a news conference on Aug. 13, 2010 in Washington, D.C., to challenge the charges made against her by the House of Representatives ethics committee.
File photo: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) holds a news conference on Aug. 13, 2010 in Washington, D.C., to challenge the charges made against her by the House of Representatives ethics committee.
(
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:56
Ethics watchdog group wants more transparency in Maxine Waters case
Ethics watchdog group wants more transparency in Maxine Waters case

Congresswoman Maxine Waters has filed a resolution asking for a bipartisan investigation of the ethics committee investigating her. One ethics watchdog group agrees with her on one thing: more information is needed about why the committee suspended a pair of lawyers.

The Los Angeles Democrat is accused of using her political clout to help a bank in which her husband owned stock. But the US House ethics committee has suspended two lawyers who investigated the case. Waters wants a bipartisan investigation of the ethics committee.

Melanie Sloan agrees. To a point.

"That seems to me to be perhaps to be overkill," she says, "but it does seem that both she and the American public frankly merit an explanation here."

Sloan heads the ethics watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. She says that if the Congresswoman is “merely trying to move the conversation from her own misconduct to issues involving the staff of the House ethics committee, that’s wrong. But it’s easy for anybody to create whatever narrative they want out of this when no one has full information."

The House has until Thursday to decide whether to vote on Waters’ resolution.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today