Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

California Supreme Court rules against breakaway Episcopal churches

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

A Newport Beach church lost a battle in the California Supreme Court today. The high court ruled that St. James Anglican Church and three other parishes don't have a right to keep their buildings and land after breaking away from the national denomination. KPCC's Susan Valot and Brian Watt say it's a battle that started more than five years ago.

Susan Valot on the court ruling:

Susan Valot: That's when the Episcopal Church allowed the consecration of an openly gay bishop in New Hampshire. That upset dozens of parishes nationwide.

A few months later, St. James in Newport Beach and two other Southern California parishes pulled out of the Episcopal Church.

That set off a legal battle over who owns the church buildings and the land they're on. A lower court sided with the parishes over the L.A. Diocese of the Episcopal Church of the United States.

But first an appeals court, and now the California Supreme Court, say the Diocese should get the assets. Eric Sohlgren is the attorney representing the parishes in the state Supreme Court battle.

Eric Sohlgren: The court seemed to be saying that a church denomination, not other kinds of religious groups but a church denomination, could pass an internal rule, claiming an interest in local church property, without even getting the consent of the local church. And even though the local church holds all the deeds to the property and has paid for every dime of it.

Sponsored message

Valot: Sohlgren says that raises constitutional issues of the government preferring certain forms of religion over others.

Sohlgren: We're disappointed that the Supreme Court seems to be enforcing unilateral rules passed by churches claiming an interest over local church property. No one else in our society gets to pass those kinds of rules. For example, a homeowners' association could not pass a rule claiming a trust interest in the homes of association members.

Valot: Attorney Eric Sohlgren, who represents the local breakaway churches, says the battle's "far from over." He says they'll take their case back to the lower court and if necessary, consider an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Brian Watt on the Episcopal Diocese' reaction:

Brian Watt: I'm Brian Watt in Los Angeles, where the Episcopal Diocese hailed the California Supreme Court ruling as "final, conclusive, and definitive." Now, Bishop Jon Bruno wants to bring the breakaway parishes back into the fold.

Bishop Jon Bruno: First of all, we're gonna issue a pastoral letter to all of our churches and all of these congregations. We're gonna invite reconciliation and people coming back.
Watt: And if there is no reconciliation?
Bruno: People can leave the Episcopal Church anytime they want. What this decision has said is that the property will stay with the Episcopal Church. We've attempted since the beginning of these litigations to make a home for all these people.

Watt: Bruno added that the Episcopal Church will continue its ministry in the Newport Beach, North Hollywood, Long Beach areas, for all congregants.

Sponsored message

Bruno: Acts of conscience are one of the things we prize about the Episcopal Church. There's a balance between the right, the left, the conservative, the liberal, and we find via media where we can allow people to participate and worship the way that they choose.

Watt: The Diocese said the California Supreme Court's ruling establishes a precedent that could spread national ripples. Its attorney acknowledged there could be further legal wrangling within the denomination, but he wouldn't speculate on how it will turn out.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today