Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
California gives LA control over freeway-facing billboards: What's next?
Listen
• 1:03
Cars and trucks are slowly moving during the evening's rush hour on Hollywood Freeway (Highway 101) in Los Angeles California on February 13, 2014.
(
Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images
)
A state ban on billboards near freeways was recently lifted for a busy section of the 110 Freeway downtown, placing authority over roadside visual clutter in the hands of the Los Angeles City Council.
Gov. Jerry Brown signed AB 1373 into law on Friday. The bill, by Assemblyman Miguel Santiago, removes Caltrans authority over new standard and digital billboards for the east side of the 110 Freeway from Interstate 10 north to 8th Street.
Don't look for the corridor to immediately resemble the neon Las Vegas Strip. There are several political hurdles to clear before new billboards can go up.
For starters, existing city law bans all new so-called off-site billboards. Those are billboards that advertise businesses that are not located where the sign is. A McDonald's sign that's not at a McDonald's restaurant is an example of an off-site sign.
City officials have been working on a new sign ordinance to permit new billboards since 2009. It's been a torturous process, with various versions proposed and discarded.
The mayor's appointed Planning Commission recently approved a set of fairly strict rules that would allow new signs only within special sign districts.
For those rules to become law, they must pass a review by the city council's Planning and Land Use Management Committee headed by downtown Councilman Jose Huizar. He's asked for a study of how the city could benefit from rules that would permit more signs to go up.
In a statement, a Huizar's spokesman said the councilman is reviewing the new state law.
Mayor Eric Garcetti was waiting for the PLUM Committee to finalize its version for council review before he weighs in, said his spokeswoman Connie Llanos in a statement.
Support for LAist comes from
"He expects any final ordinance to continue protecting the character of neighborhoods and require thorough vetting by the City Planning Commission, Council and Mayor," she said.
Meantime, the billboard industry continues to lobby the city.
"Those downtown developers, those interests, are going to have a lot of sway with the City Council," said Dennis Hathaway of the Coalition to Ban Billboard Blight.
Sign companies have put up billboards endorsing council members who are drafting the new sign law. Those companies are also among the city's biggest spenders on lobbying. As of June, billboard companies were on track for record spending in support of changing L.A. sign laws.
In the first two quarters of 2016, outdoor advertising companies had spent more than $1 million lobbying city officials. Clear Channel, also known as iHeartMedia Inc. led with $446,626. Regency Outdoor Advertising spent $159,380 and Outfront Media, previously known as CBS Outdoor, spent $137,000.
Lamar Advertising spent $58,700 during 2015 on billboards supporting the reelection six City Council candidates. Nearly half that amount, $26,500, was spent on billboards for Huizar, who chairs the PLUM Committee, which will make critical recommendations to the City Council about what new sign ordinance to adopt.
The company spent $7,600 each on billboards for Marqueece Harris-Dawson, Paul Krekorian, Nury Martinez, and Herb Wesson. It also spent $1,800 on billboard space for Mitchell Englander. Councilmembers Harris-Dawson and Englader are on the PLUM Committee.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist