Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
California considers new rules to allow direct consumption of treated sewer water

California is considering becoming the first state in the country to allow people to drink recycled sewer water. For years, the state has allowed this to go on indirectly, by permitting water utilities to put treated wastewater into reservoirs and groundwater, where it is diluted with other water sources. Now, the goal is to skip that step and and put the treated effluent straight into drinking water.
A new report released by the State Water Resources Control Board last week outlines what needs to happen before drinking treated wastewater, also known as "direct potable reuse," becomes a reality. Here are some key takeaways from that report.
Why is this happening now?
California is growing – the population is expected to reach 50 million by 2050. At the same time, the state is staring down a future that will be hotter and drier. As a result, state officials are hoping to boost the use of recycled water – including sewage.
In 2010, the state legislature asked the California Department of Public Health to look into the feasibility of recycling sewage for drinking water and report back by the end of 2016. The report released last week is part of that process.
What did the report find?
It found that putting recycled sewer water directly into drinking water is technically possible, but there are a lot of unanswered questions: like how to identify unknown contaminants in the sewage, how to monitor for pathogens in wastewater and how to define "rigorous testing," "diverse sources," and other subjective terms so that future regulations are clear and enforceable.
How soon will it be before we’re drinking treated sewer water?
There's no timeline for developing the regulations. And there would need to be regulations in place before anyone is putting treated sewer water directly into drinking water.
But in Southern California, many of us already are drinking treated wastewater -- at least, indirectly. Places like Orange County, the Chino Basin and coastal Los Angeles have been blending treated wastewater with groundwater for years. But the difference is, the treated sewer water has been sitting in a reservoir or underground aquifer before it gets delivered to our tap. That means the water is diluted, and it also gives water managers time to wait for lab results from the wastewater treatment plant, and make last minute changes if something goes awry.
It will be quite a while before there is a pipeline directly from the wastewater treatment plant to the drinking water treatment plant, said Randy Barnard, chief of the recycled water unit with the State Water Resources Conservation Board.
What are the concerns about drinking treated sewer water?
Sewage is not an ideal source of water. “It has to be closely analyzed and monitored. It has a potential to carry a lot of things that are adverse to public health,” like viruses, medications and chemicals, according to Barnard.
That kind of monitoring is expensive. Barnard said treating sewage costs more than importing water from Northern California, and as a result, water agencies will only turn to direct recycling of sewage when they’ve exhausted all their other options. Only desalination costs more.
Still, many water agencies in Southern California have expressed interest in recycling treated wastewater, and say their customers are less opposed to it than in the past.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.