Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Lawsuit alleges state allows insurance companies to deny coverage for child autism treatments

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 1:46
Lawsuit alleges state allows insurance companies to deny coverage for child autism treatments
Lawsuit alleges state allows insurance companies to deny coverage for child autism treatments

A new lawsuit alleges that the California Department of Managed Health Care is violating state law by allowing health insurers to refuse payment for certain treatments for kids with autism. KPCC’s Brian Watt reports.

Brian Watt: The lawsuit focuses on a treatment approach known as Applied Behavioral Analysis. It involves intensive one-on-one interaction between a therapist and an autistic child for 30 or more hours a week. That makes it costly: $50,000 to $100,000 a year for each patient.

For years, insurance companies refused pay for this approach because they said it’s experimental. But medical experts and the US Surgeon General vouch for it now, and doctors like developmental pediatrician Anshu Batra usually recommend it for at least six months.

Dr. Anshu Batra: I have many families that are unable to access these therapies and I’m left basically unable to do my job.

Watt: Batra and the non-profit Consumer Watchdog filed the lawsuit.

Until a few months ago, when insurance companies denied a claim for the treatment, consumers could appeal through the managed health care department’s Independent Medical Review system. The team of independent doctors in that system increasingly sided with consumers.

The suit alleges that in March, after some lobbying from insurance companies, the department favored insurers and moved the review process for the treatments to an in-house staff. In a statement, the Department of Managed Health Care says it’s administering the consumer complaint process according to law.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today