This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
FTC vs. Amazon: Are your kids incurring charges for unauthorized in-app purchases?
File photo: The new Amazon tablet called the Kindle Fire is displayed on September 28, 2011 in New York City. The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint Thursday alleging that Amazon has billed parents and other account holders millions of dollars for in-app charges made by children without authorization.
(
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
)
Amazon has billed parents and other account-holders for millions of dollars after their children made unauthorized in-app purchases, according to the Federal Trade Commission.
In a complaint filed Thursday in federal court, the FTC asked for a ban on the billing of all in-app purchases made without parental consent, saying Amazon keeps 30 percent of such charges. The FTC said it is seeking a court order that would require customer refunds for the unauthorized charges after thousands of parents complained about charges made by their kids.
“Amazon’s in-app system allowed children to incur unlimited charges on their parents’ accounts without permission,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez in a statement. “Even Amazon's own employees recognized the serious problem its process created."
According to the FTC, internal emails from Amazon referred to the situation as a "near house on fire" and show that a month after introducing apps into the Amazon store, the company was already concerned about in-app purchases made without password protection.
Amazon has said previously that it worked to address the problem and already refunded customers who told the company their children made purchases without their consent.
Amazon has also hinted that it would fight the charges rather than settle, as Apple did earlier this year for some $32 million.
"It's an understatement to say that this response is deeply disappointing. The Commission's unwillingness to depart from the precedent it set with Apple despite our very different facts leaves us no choice but to defend our approach in court," Amazon's attorney wrote in a letter to Ramirez dated July 1.
Sponsored message
Part of the problem, according to the FTC, is that kids’ games often blur the line between what costs real money versus virtual cash:
In the app “Ice Age Village,” for example, the complaint noted that children can use “coins” and “acorns” to buy items in the game without a real-money charge. However, they can also purchase additional “coins” and “acorns” using real money on a screen that is visually similar to the one that has no real-money charge. The largest quantity purchase available in the app would cost $99.99.
In another letter addressed to Ramirez on Wednesday, Republican Senator Deb Fischer of Nebraska called the regulator's actions a "de facto tax on innovation that threatens future growth and opportunity." Fischer writes:
I am concerned that pressuring companies into sweeping, multi-decade consent orders reflects an attempt by the Commission to gain by enforcement what has been withheld by Congress — namely, unchecked regulatory control over the technology sector.
Manne argues that certain Amazon features, such as its 1-click purchase, are user favorites and that the company provides several ways to prevent kids (or adults) from accidentally paying for in-app extras. Manne writes:
Amazon has built its entire business around the “1-click” concept — which consumers love — and implemented a host of notification and security processes hewing as much as possible to that design choice, but nevertheless taking account of the sorts of issues raised by in-app purchases. Moreover — and perhaps most significantly — it has implemented an innovative and comprehensive parental control regime (including the ability to turn off all in-app purchases) — Kindle Free Time — that arguably goes well beyond anything the FTC required in its Apple consent order.
Sponsored message
DOCUMENT: Read the FTC complaint
This story has been updated.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
