Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Lawyers make final arguments in Adenhart trial

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:58
Lawyers make final arguments in Adenhart trial
Lawyers make final arguments in Adenhart trial

Jurors yesterday heard closing statements in the murder trial of the man accused of driving drunk and causing the crash that killed Angel pitcher Nick Adenhart. The Santa Ana jury will make its decision soon. Prosecutors might have made a bigger decision long ago.

It was when they decided to charge 23-year-old Andrew Gallo not with vehicular manslaughter, but with second-degree murder. The penalty is far tougher. So is the prosecution’s job of convincing the jury that the drunk driver intended to kill someone.

To that end, prosecutor Susan Price reminded the jury that Gallo was on probation for drunken driving when he crashed his van into the car that carried Nick Adenhart; the Angel pitcher and two friends were killed. Price noted that Gallo had signed legal papers that warned him if he drove drunk again and killed someone, he could be charged with murder.

Defense attorney Jacqueline Goodman told jurors Gallo did not intend to kill anyone. She said his brother-in-law was to be the “designated driver” – but he got drunk instead. She said “common sense” says Gallo is no murderer.

The legal stars might not be aligned for Gallo. As jurors in his trial heard closing statements, a Fullerton jury in a different drunken driving case handed down a conviction for second-degree murder.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today