Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Fear of unrest rises for 1st time in post-LA riots poll
Listen
• 7:31
File: A group of people hold up signs advocating changes in the Los Angeles Police Department during the LA Riots unrest on April 29, 1992.
(
Gary Leonard/LAPL
)
More Angelenos today than at any time in the last decade-and-a-half believe that another riot is likely within the next five years. Those are the surprising results of a recent survey from Loyola Marymount University.
Every five years since 1997, political science professor Fernando Guerra has polled L.A. residents about how they perceive their city, and as the LA Times reports, the number of people who believe civil unrest could happen again soon has decreased each time. The project is part of the Center for the Study of Los Angeles, which Guerra founded after the L.A. Riots in 1992. Guerra is also a board member at KPCC.
This week marks the 25th anniversary of the uprising, which was sparked by the acquittal of four Los Angeles police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King.
Guerra says Angelenos are mostly optimistic about the state of race relations and the direction of the city — but one demographic is increasingly pessimistic. "It's actually driven by millennials. Millennials, those who didn't even experience the riots, are more likely to believe that riots are likely in the next five years." Guerra says.
Support for LAist comes from
Guerra thinks it's because millennials, shaped by social media, see rioting as a natural extension of other types of political activism.
"You mobilize to vote for civic action, you can even mobilize to protest and march and that rioting would just be a legitimate continuation of that process," he tells KPCC.
Morning Edition host Alex Cohen spoke with Guerra about the survey's details.
Interview highlights:
On “riots” vs. “unrest” in the survey questioning: Different people here use different terms and that can also really shape how you view what happened. How do you frame it?
There is no perfect survey. The word questioning, the word ordering, how you select the respondents — all of that creates biases and every single survey is bias in one way or the other. We try to control all that as much as possible... We feel very comfortable, having studied Los Angeles for over 30 years and trying to have as best a pulse on the city as possible, that we have shaped these questions as unbiased as possible and directed it in a way that helps us understand the city and explain the city to our students.
On the one hand, people are feeling better than they have in quite some time about race relations and yet they’re also feeling that riots might be more likely. Those seem to be findings that are at odds with each other. How do you explain that contrast?
They do, but then you contextualize it, that this survey was actually done in January, during the presidential transition. Los Angeles is incredibly democratic-progressive and protests were occurring and they were being planned and that’s one aspect of it... While they feel good about all kinds of social and economic indicators, this one area is, in a sense, saying “We’re willing to do this, if institutions are not responsive, if they don’t protect us. If they’re not part of who we are, they don’t deserve to be legitimate and to be around.” And riots would be an answer to that. This doesn’t mean that they’re looking for this to occur, it’s just a sense that the underlying aspects are there. One thing that is clear that Angelenos also believe strongly is that economic disparity is increasing and at the end of the day, it’s that disparity that caused the riot. The acquittal in the Rodney King beating might’ve been the spark, but the inequality that existed in ’92, and is even worse today, set the base for that type of action.
Support for LAist comes from
It seems to me that there’s something else that’s different now, which is the fact that most people walking around L.A. today have a cell phone with them, which means that any time, we have the technology to capture interactions with authorities and share them almost instantaneously. Can you explain how that might be affecting the entire situation?
The Rodney King video went viral in a time where we didn’t have the internet to the extent that we do [now.] It was taken on one of those gigantic hand-held cameras that’s probably in a museum today. This is what the young people are used to and they’ve seen more of this type of videos than ever before. It doesn’t mean that police-community relations are worse today or that these incidents are occurring more. What it does mean is that we’re seeing a lot more of them.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist