Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
News

Judge temporarily blocks Pentagon action against Mark Kelly over illegal orders video

A bald man in a suit sits behind a dair. A nameplate reads: Mr. Kelly.
Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., takes his seat during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Jan. 15.
(
Tom Brenner
/
Getty Images
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has granted Sen. Mark Kelly's request for a preliminary injunction against Pete Hegseth, in a lawsuit filed by the Arizona Democrat accusing the defense secretary of trying to punish him for his political speech.

Kelly, a former Navy Captain, sued Hegseth in January, one week after the defense secretary moved to formally censure him for participating in a video where he and several Democratic lawmakers told U.S. servicemembers they can refuse illegal orders.

"Our rules are clear. You can refuse illegal orders," Kelly says in the video.

Hegseth has labeled Kelly's statements as "seditious" and announced a review of his retirement grade, which could lead to a demotion in rank and reduction in retirement pay.

Thursday's ruling temporarily blocks the Pentagon from taking steps to discipline Kelly. It was issued by Judge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush appointee on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

"This Court has all it needs to conclude that Defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly's First Amendment freedoms and threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees," Leon wrote in his opinion. "After all, as Bob Dylan famously said, 'You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.'"

A white man in a slim-cut blue suits walks in a corridor near other people.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth arrives on Capitol Hill for a classified briefing with senators on the situation in Venezuela on Jan. 7.
(
J. Scott Applewhite
/
AP
)
Sponsored message

In his lawsuit, Kelly's lawyers argued that the Pentagon review was both "unconstitutional and legally baseless."

"The First Amendment forbids the government and its officials from punishing disfavored expression or retaliating against protected speech," the suit reads. "That prohibition applies with particular force to legislators speaking on matters of public policy."

In a statement following the court's ruling, Kelly said the case was bigger than him.

"This administration was sending a message to millions of retired veterans that they too can be censured or demoted just for speaking out. That's why I couldn't let this stand."

"I appreciate the judge's careful consideration of this case, and the clarity of his ruling," he continued. "But I also know that this might not be over yet, because this President and this administration do not know how to admit when they're wrong."

Hegseth responded to the ruling in a post on X, saying the judge's decision would be "immediately appealed."

"Sedition is sedition, 'Captain,'" he added.

Sponsored message

Kelly was one of six Democratic lawmakers to participate in the video, which was released on social media in November amid concerns from Democrats in Congress about the legality of U.S. military strikes on alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean.

The video drew a furious response from President Trump, who in a post on social media called it "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" Trump also said the lawmakers — all with military or intelligence backgrounds — "should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL."

Federal prosecutors attempted to indict the lawmakers, but a grand jury in Washington, D.C., ultimately rejected the effort, according to a source familiar with the matter who was not authorized to speak publicly.

It is not clear what charges prosecutors attempted to bring against the lawmakers. Previously the Justice Department had declined to "confirm or deny the existence of an investigation" into either Democrat.
Copyright 2026 NPR

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today