With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Will A CA City's Vaccine 'Sticker Policy' Violate Privacy Rights?
Montclair workers will soon receive stickers to place on their employee badges verifying they have been vaccinated.
(
Chava Sanchez
/
LAist
)
City workers in Montclair who can show that they're fully vaccinated against COVID-19 will get a sticker to put on their employee badges — and that's raising some questions.
Some in the San Bernardino County city of about 40,000 residents say that the new element in the masking policy for city workers is a violation of privacy — and could even open the city up to a lawsuit.
City Manager Edward Starr came up with the idea. He noted that city workers aren't required to disclose their vaccination status.
"They don't need to show the card to anybody except when perhaps they're challenged by a supervisor. They can keep their ID card in their pocket, which many do," said Starr.
Support for LAist comes from
Under current Cal-OSHA workplace rules, those who don't disclose their vaccine status, or say they're not vaccinated, still have to mask up around other people.
Starr says the sticker will help city staffers identify those who need to wear a mask or not.
A member of the Montclair city council recently took issue with the policy, saying it could breach medical privacy laws, but Starr said he and the city attorney both disagree.
"Federal law, particularly the ADA, does not suggest that this in any way reveals a medical condition, nor does it reveal a disability, so it does not create a liability in that regard," Starr said.
One important note: Montclair city workers will not be required to put the sticker on their ID cards, but it's strongly encouraged. The policy will take effect on Monday.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent. -
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
Best of LAist