Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA County Delays Rollout Of New Law That Expands Criteria For Involuntary Treatment
L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath authored a motion to delay implementation of SB43 until 2026.
(
YouTube screenshot
)
Los Angeles County supervisors voted Tuesday to delay implementation of new legislation that expands the definitions by which people living with mental illness and substance use issues can be held against their will.
Supervisors voted 4-1 to delay implementation until January 2026.
Senate Bill 43, which easily cleared the state legislature in September and was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in October, changed state law to allow people living with a serious mental illness or severe substance use disorder who are unable to provide for their personal safety or medical care to be deemed “gravely disabled” and held against their will.
But supervisors and officials raised several concerns about whether the county would be ready to implement the expanded criteria by next year. While she shared some of the concerns raised, Supervisor Janice Hahn was the lone “no” vote on the measure, stating that the status quo was “unacceptable” and calling for more urgency from county departments.
Support for LAist comes from
Board Chair Lindsey Horvath, the author of the motion, said it was “absolutely absurd” that the county would be expected to implement SB 43 by January without the right support.
“Our health care facilities are not prepared for the magnitude of what this response could look like,” Horvath said.
Among other concerns, county officials raised questions about whether the behavioral health infrastructure is ready for the new law.
“We have a very impacted system already,” Lisa Wong, director of the county Department of Mental Health told supervisors. “So if we further bring in this expanded population, it’s going to cause even more of a bottleneck.”
Gary Tsai, director of Substance Abuse Prevention and Control at the county Department of Health, pointed out that there is currently no model for involuntary care for people living with substance use issues. Tsai said that infrastructure would need to be built out in order for the county to put the new law into effect and provide appropriate care.
In a statement after the motion passed, Hahn said there are people who need treatment now who will not last beyond the two-year delay.
Support for LAist comes from
“I want to see a sense of urgency from our County departments. I think we can get this done sooner and I want to see us try," Hahn said.
Many family members who have loved ones struggling with mental health and substance use issues see the new law as a long-delayed lifeline and want to see it implemented as soon as possible.
Groups like Disability Rights California have strongly opposed SB 43, claiming it “takes resources away from community-based services and housing to fund locked institutions, disproportionately impacts communities of color, and makes it harder to fight conservatorship.”
After the vote on Tuesday, L.A. joins the majority of counties in the state that have chosen to delay implementation of the new criteria. San Francisco is expected to roll out the new law in January.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist