With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA Is Set To Become The Biggest City In America To Ban Fur Sales
Benjamin Lin holds up a fur coat at the B.B. Hawk showroom in San Francisco on Friday, March 16, 2018. (Photo by Eric Risberg/AP)
()
Put down the pelt --Los Angeles City Council voted 13-1 on Tuesday in favor of a measure that will ban fur sales.
The measure, Section 53.75, was introduced in June of last year by councilmembers Bob Blumenfield and Paul Koretz, and makes it illegal to manufacture, sell, distribute, import or export any fur or fur product in the city, starting January 1, 2021.
Since one councilmember, Greig Smith, voted against the measure, it will go back before council next week before going to the mayor's desk for final approval.
Today's vote takes Los Angeles one step closer to being the largest city in America to ban the sale and manufacture of fur products.
Support for LAist comes from
There are some exceptions to Blumenfield and Koretz's measure. The following would NOT be illegal:
- Furs of animals trapped by California Fish and Game license holders;
- Pelts from already deceased animals being preserved through taxidermy;
- Used furs transferred between private parties;
- Used furs being bought, sold, donated or owned by a person who's not in the primary business of selling fur products, including non-profits, second-hand shops and pawn shops;
- Manufacturing a fur product by exclusively sourcing used fur;
- A fur product that's only being transported through the city.
The ordinance states that it will "foster a more kind and humane environment within the City," and that "the sale and manufacture of fur is inconsistent with the City's goal of being a community who cares about and promotes animal welfare."
At Tuesday's City Council meeting, Blumenfield noted that many major fashion brands and designers, including Gucci, Diane von Furstenberg, Chanel and Michael Kors have already decided to remove fur from their lines.
"Let's show that we are that responsible governing body, and end this outdated and deplorable practice," he said. "The time is long overdue -- it's 2019."
Added Koretz, "We saw films of this in committee it was hard to take...even the most humane fur process is not humane, and it's time we end it."
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care. -
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past. -
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
Best of LAist