With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Froggie Went A-Courtin: Feds Sued By Environmental Group Over Endangered SoCal Frog
April is National Frog Month, so it was as good of a time as any to sue the feds over failing efforts to protect an endangered SoCal frog from extinction.
An environmental group, the Center for Biological Diversity, reportedly filed a a 60-day notice of intent to sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on "allegations that the agency failed to develop a recovery plan for the endangered Southern California mountain yellow-legged frog," reported the Riverside Press-Enterprise notes the Associated Press.
For nine years the mountain yellow-legged frog has been on the federal endangered species list with only 200 adult frogs remaining in the San Bernardino, San Jacinto and San Gabriel mountains, notes the Press-Enterprise where they once thrived.
Scientists with the San Diego Zoo and U.S. Geological Survey have worked aggressively in the past few years to breed the frogs in a laboratory and return them to the wild in hopes of increasing the population. Lack of a recovery plan -- a road map of steps required under the Endangered Species Act to save a plant or animal from extinction -- has made the work more difficult, said Adam Backlin, a USGS ecologist working on the frog breeding project.
The suit also addresses the endangered California tiger salamander. A Fish and Wildlife spokesperson declined to comment because of pending litigation.