Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Former D.A. Gil Garcetti Says He Didn't Want Marcia Clark On The O.J. Trial

gil-garcetti.jpg
Gil Garcetti (Kevin Winter/ Getty)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Former Los Angeles District Attorney (and father of Instagram star Eric Garcetti) Gil Garcetti has come forward with some behind-the-scenes stories about the prosecution of the O.J. Simpson trial, which his office oversaw. Thanks to the popularity of FX's brilliant miniseries The People v. O.J. Simpson, the case has reignited a lot of "where are they now" fascination, and the emergence of even more behind-the-scenes details about the trial.Garcetti told the New York Post that hiring Marcia Clark as the lead attorney was a mistake.

"She wasn't my choice—I didn't pick her," he said "almost coldly," according to the Post.

He continued:

Marcia is a very good lawyer, but one of the things with her was that she didn’t heed the advice of our trial consultant who told her not to pick African-American women — particularly black mothers — for that jury,” he said, noting eight black women wound up on the panel. She didn’t listen and once she did that, there was no chance that we’d get a guilty verdict, although I still thought we’d get two or three jurors to hold out for a hung jury.

And then it was time for a little confession! Garcetti continued:
I've never told anyone this story before. I went to a function, a Hollywood agents' function and everyone there was talking about the O.J. trial. Now, there was this one African-American couple, an agent and her husband who is a Ph.D. Naturally, I steered clear of the trial talk, but what the Ph.D. told me was that he thought O.J. was guilty but he'd still vote not guilty and that floored me. I asked him how he could vote not guilty if he knew he was guilty...I asked him how he would explain that to his kids and he just dropped his head and said he didn't know.

That's when I knew I had a big problem.

Garcetti also said that he sought the council of former President Jimmy Carter, who told him that a guilty verdict was not gonna happen. Carter said, "'Gil, forget it, they are going to find him not guilty. The verdict will be about payback...There have been too many blacks who have been convicted and even executed. O.J. is not going to do it again.'"

Garcetti said that he's recorded The People v. O.J. Simpson, and has so far watched the first three episodes. It doesn't sound like he's much of a fan.

“They are making up the dialogue; it’s very misleading,” he said. Let's hope that made-up dialogue refers to the scene in which he, played by Bruce Greenwood, urges Clark to get a makeover that will make her appear "softer."

Sponsored message

O.J., obviously, did not like Garcetti; as TMZ noted in 2010, a documentary called O.J.: Monster or Myth? showed the Juice driving by Garcetti's home and shouting "Asshole!" out the window.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today