One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Los Angeles Times Prepares to Go Behind a Paywall
Photo by laverrue via the LAist Featured Photos pool
Sorry freeloaders, you've only got a little over a week to get your fill of free Los Angeles Times articles.Starting on March 5, the Times is putting up a paywall. If you want to read more than 15 articles at the Times in a month, you're going to have to cough up some money, the Times says. The porous paywall (not unlike the New York Times') will be launched with an introductory rate for the first few weeks:
After the 99 cents for the first four weeks, the rate will rise to $1.99 a week in a package that also includes the Sunday newspaper. Digital-only access will cost $3.99. Online access will be included at no extra charge for print subscribers.
The Times isn't calling it a paywall or digital subscription, like other newspapers that have tried to stave off steep drops in circulation, including The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal or Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. The Times is calling it a "membership," which sounds a little douchey, but the paper is hoping that Angelenos will bite so they can get "retail discounts, deals and giveaways" in addition to news about the "Los Angeles Lakers, the USC Trojans, Hollywood and the entertainment industry."Kevin Roderick over at LA Observed points out that the Times used the announcement of its paywall as an opportunity to announce some important news for the newspaper: the Times is killing the newspaper versions of its Health, Food and Home sections and rolling them into a section called "Saturday." (We have a guess about which day this section might appear.) Normally, we'd think this was a sign that these sections are going to be decimated, but the Times did just win a bidding war over Pulitzer Prize-winning food critic Jonathan Gold.
So what do you think, fair readers: Are you ready to cough up a few bucks to read the Times?
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
