With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
In-N-Out Suing Smashburger Over 'Triple Double' Burger

In-N-Out has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Denver-based Smashburger over the Colorado chain's new Smashburger "Triple Double" menu item. In In-N-Out's view, the Triple Double is infringing on the Southern California-based burger chain's famed Double Double territory.
“Smashburger’s use of the Triple Double and Smashburger Triple Double marks is likely to confuse and mislead the consuming public, and injure In-N-Out, by causing consumers to believe incorrectly that Smashburger’s products originate from or are authorized by In-N-Out,” the lawsuit, which was filed Monday, states, according to the Orange County Register.
In-N-Out has continuously used and held trademarks "in connection with hamburger sandwiches in interstate commerce" for both the Double Double and the Triple Triple since the mid-1960s, according to the lawsuit.
Smashburger, which was founded in 2007, expanded to Orange County five years ago and now has three locations there, according to the Register. There are also Smashburger outposts in Culver City, at L.A. Live, and at Universal Studios, among other L.A.-area locations.
The Triple Double, which was introduced last month, has two patties and three layers of cheese. In-N-Out's Double Double and Triple Triple have two patties and two layers of cheese, and three patties and three layers of cheese, respectively.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.