Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.


Burbank NIMBYs v. Whole Foods

Support your source for local news!
Today, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. The local news you read here every day is crafted for you, but right now, we need your help to keep it going. In these uncertain times, your support is even more important. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership. Thank you.

There were Sherman Oaks residents against Best Buy. There's Sunland-Tujunga residents against Home Depot. Enter Burbank Equestrians.

According to Daily News, Whole Foods wants to build a store at 901 W. Alameda at Main Street, which is in the Ranch Equestrian District of the city. The increased traffic that would affect equestrian owners/riders and the general "fit" of its location is being opposed as the Planning Board voted 4-1 against the market.

The city suggests putting in bicycle lanes on the street for shared equestrian use and the developer is willing to widen Main street's intersection at Alameda with right- and left-turn lanes to ease traffic.

Support for LAist comes from

Instead of widening the street, Whole Foods should pay for an intelligent crosswalk for equestrians and build a state defined multiuse trail, which is unpaved and available for equestrian, hiking, and mountain bike use.

After all, NIMBY does rhyme with quimby (no, not that quimby!).

Most Read