Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The Problems With This 'Watson' Sequel Are Elementary
In November 2010, a play called Watson: The Last Great Tale of the Legendary Sherlock Holmes was one of my favorite shows. It combined clever writing, an expert ensemble and constantly inventive direction to be a true showcase of great L.A. theatre. Its writer/director, Jaime Robledo, is clearly possessed of abundant talent. It is thus with regret that I have to report that the new sequel premiering at Sacred Fools, Watson And The Dark Art of Harry Houdini, is disappointing, a pale imitation of the original that only sporadically works.
After the publication of John Watson's (Scott Leggett) book about his partnership with Sherlock Holmes (Joe Fria) has estranged the two for a time, they're reluctantly teamed again to attempt to solve a new series of baffling murders. Holmes is still much the same unhinged yet brilliant egotist, but Watson is haunted by the death of his wife, Mary. To help with his overwhelming grief he sees Sigmund Freud (Graham Skipper), whose advice is unfailingly crude if often accurate. Holmes and Watson's inquiry leads them to America, where they investigate possible suspect Harry Houdini (Donal Thoms-Cappello), who, not inappropriately, is both more and less than he appears.
Although Watson is required to be more lugubrious in this show, I actually prefer Leggett's performance here more than in the original play. His connection with the role seems to have deepened, and his portrayal of loss and tentative steps toward living again is moving. Fria is again terrific as Holmes, and he's particularly funny in a scene where he squabbles childishly with his older brother. Skipper, who was excellent in the recent Re-Animator The Musical, gets points for trying hard as Freud, but, in a role made indelible by French Stewart in the first play, he doesn't entirely make the outrageous character work. Thoms-Cappello is personable and properly inscrutable as Houdini, and impresses in a re-creation of Houdini's hanging man escape routine. Carrie Keranen is charming as Watson's shipboard acquaintance Violet.
Robledo's direction of the original Watson was a stunning showcase for his creativity, one memorable set piece after another blending into an astonishing whole. His direction here feels much less inspired, and although there are nice visual moments, from a merry-go-round ride to a shuffleboard game, the "wow" factor isn't as prevalent. This may be because Robledo has written a very different play this time, which I think is the crux of the problem. It seems to me that he wanted to write a piece about loss and death, but instead of pursuing that on its own, he placed it within the Watson story, which unfortunately isn't a great fit. As a result the Holmes/Watson adventure gets short shrift, with an abrupt ending that curiously tosses the mystery element of the story aside unresolved, a conclusion I doubt will satisfy many audience members. I have no doubt that Robledo will go on to write and direct many great shows, but unfortunately this highly anticipated project is a misfire.
"Watson And The Dark Art of Harry Houdini" plays at Sacred Fools through July 27. Tickets are available online.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?