With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The Creepy 'Poltergeist' House Is A Little TOO Close To L.A., If You Ask Us
()
The original Poltergeist house is one of the more recognizable movie homes from the past few decades. It got a fair amount of screen time, as the home itself was a central character—in the movie it was part of the Cuesta Verde planned community, which we quickly learn was built on top of an old burial ground.
I've consulted myself-as-a-child and confirmed that the 1982 classic is one of the scariest movies of our time, and the home is a big part of that. It looked like a lot of other homes at that time—a late 1970s cookie cutter in the suburbs—so it instantly felt familiar to many. (In the trailer, the narrator even declares: "The house looks just like the one next to it, and the one next to that, and the one next to that.") Its generic look made it a sort of "everyhome," and because of that it was easy to psych yourself up into thinking your own home would come to get you. Hey, it's okay, maybe you were young, too... or incredibly stoned, like Mr. and Mrs. Freeling:
The house used is a real one, located on Roxbury Street in the Simi Valley, just outside of L.A. And while it's not really built upon a cemetery, you may not want to live there. Some believe the movie—the entire franchise, even—is cursed. The main reason for this is that death has seemed to follow those attached to the franchise—Dominique Dunne (Dana Freeling), Heather O'Rourke (Carol Ann Freeling), Will Sampson (Taylor, a good spirit), and Julian Beck (Kane, an evil spirit) have all died. Two of these were premature and unexpected deaths.
Support for LAist comes from
In the below video, one theory is brought up that Spielberg & Co. cursed the film by using real human remains.
The original movie’s production designer, Jim Spencer, told Yahoo last year, "Steven liked that house because it was the end of the road. It was a two story Valley-type mock Tudor and it just fit everything. The neighborhood [was what] we call ‘Spielbergia,’ where E.T. and a couple of his other films were shot. He always wanted to be in normal residential areas.” (Note: while Spielberg didn't direct the movie, he was producer, and wrote the screenplay.)
The interior of the home wasn't used, only the exterior, and there was a model built for the final scene, when the home (spoiler alert) "implodes into a portal." According to one recollection, to make this scene happen "a replica about four feet across was constructed ... the model was positioned face up over an industrial vacuum through which wires were run and attached to points inside the house. When the camera was ready, the vacuum was turned on and the effects guys blasted the house with shotguns." That's some old school special effects! Check it out:
The home (a private residence, so if you plan to visit please do so respectfully by just driving by) was last sold in 1979 according to online records, so it's possible the original owners still reside there.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol. -
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails. -
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
Best of LAist