Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,535 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

NFL Stadium Developer Loses $1 Billion in Personal Wealth

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

nfl-stadium-09.jpg

That's the current economy for you. Own a lot of property and Forbes Magazine will catch on in their most recent 400 wealthiest Americans list. Developer Ed Roski Jr., CEO of Majestic Realty Company, dropped from No. 163 to No. 236 on the annual list, which has one sports consultant speculating trouble for the proposed NFL stadium in the city of Industry.

Roski's loss in personal wealth was due to the lower real estate values, but he says that's not the whole story. "There is not just one stream of things," Roski told the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Real estate is not great right now. It's part of the way we live and everybody is going to survive." Add to that the silver line: recession = lower constructions costs and interest rates.

But a sports consultant in Chicago says not so fast: "You have to contribute a significant amount of cash into the stadium or into the team," said Marc Ganis, president of SportsCorp. Roski says lower real estate values do not mean rent checks collected are lower.

In another aspect over the controversial project, some state legislation may pass which will scoot the project past some environmental laws.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today