Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Movie Review: The Golden Compass

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Let's get this out of the way immediately--if you are a fan of Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy, you will be disappointed by some of the elisions and excisions made in this movie. The degree to which it bothers you will largely determine how much you enjoy The Golden Compass. I won't get into the details too much since it would spoil the movie for those unfamiliar with the novels. Let's just say that--much like The Two Towers--the ending of the first book has been pushed to the next film and two characters have been spared from death.

The overarching element of controversy surrounding the books--its declared Atheism--has been entirely stripped away from the movie. The Holy Church/Magesterium of the trilogy has simply become the Magesterium in the film, and they are portrayed as little more than a powerful government hell-bent on experimenting on children and stifling freedom. They are far more Nazi than they are Catholic. Similarly, Lord Asriel has been denatured. The one-time architect of the destruction of Heaven is now just a rogue scientist on the run.

You might think by my comments so far that I didn't much like the movie, but this would be incorrect. In fact, I enjoyed it quite a bit. The depth and breadth of imagination evident in its visual design is so profound that I often found myself completely carried away in the story, oblivious to what was missing from the novels. The casting of the film is almost flawless. Though he is only briefly in the movie, Daniel Craig is an ideal Lord Asriel--brilliant, tough, unsparing. I'm excited to see what he does as his role expands in the forthcoming films.

Nicole Kidman shines equally as bright as the cold Ms. Coulter. She hasn't been this fiercely beautiful since Eyes Wide Shut and has never carried so much quiet menace in her smile. Sam Elliot and Eva Green are also perfect as Lee Scoresby and Serafina Pekkula (though their roles are significantly diminished from the novels). As the heroine at the center of the story, it would be impossible to improve upon the casting of Dakota Blue Richards. In her first film, she is the equal of every actor with whom she shares the screen--no small feat considering the power of Craig, Kidman and Ian McKellan (as the voice of the panserbjorne, Iorek Byrnison).

Back to the visual design--new ground is broken in The Golden Compass. The CGI artists have truly created a world that is ours but not ours. The rendering of the daemonsis seamless. Even in scenes where crowds fill the screen, there is never a lack of individuality in each creature. I had expected to see your typical CGI army of animals--think any battle scene in Lord of the Rings--but the composition here is much more random and real. Another issue that originally concerned me--Lyra's reading of the alethiometer--is a wonder in how it weaves together her thoughts with Dust to create something purely cinematic and not just visual exposition.

Sponsored message

It's the dichotomy between the stripped-down story and the overwhelming visual canvas that is ultimately so frustrating about The Golden Compass. I certainly recommend the movie, but I'm left wondering how much better it could have been if New Line had the guts to make a movie that was closer in spirit to the novels. Certainly, all adaptations require changes and reductions, but I think writer-director Chris Weitz may have cut this one a little too close to the bone. I can't imagine anyone actually being offended by the treatment of religion in this movie. In the final summation, that may be its biggest weakness.

Tickets & Showtimes

Photos courtesy of New Line Cinemas

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right