With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
University of California must revisit policy that bars undocumented students from on-campus jobs, court rules

Topline:
The University of California must rethink its policy that bars students who are undocumented from working on campus, a state appeals court ruled Aug. 5.
What does this mean? The University of California doesn’t have to reverse its policy, but it must reconsider it. It’s unclear whether officials will make any changes.
UC officials say: “The University of California is reviewing the court’s ruling on hiring undocumented students,” a UC spokesperson said. “To the extent it’s compliant with the law, the University continues to believe undocumented students deserve the same opportunities as our other students.”
Background: Last October, immigrant rights groups filed a lawsuit against the UC system, arguing that the university discriminated against students who are undocumented.
The lawsuit came following two blows to undocumented student workers. In January 2024, UC officials rejected a proposal to open up jobs to students who are undocumented. In September, Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill that would have done the same.
Why it matters: Hiroshi Motomura, law professor at UCLA, said the court’s order is a significant victory for the movement to open up employment opportunities for UC students regardless of their immigration status. “The main thing is to create a level playing field for people to apply and to be considered,” he told LAist.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.