Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Transportation & Mobility

The Dodgers gondola project lives to see another day: Metro board moves forward with plans

A mock up showing a gondola and its cables moving up across the L.A. skyline
A digital mock up of the planned aerial gondola traversing the L.A. skyline
(
Courtesy Zero Emissions Transit
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The controversial gondola proposal for Dodger Stadium overcame a vital hurdle on Thursday when the Metro Board of Directors voted to approve the final environmental impact report.

The vote means the project lives to see another day, but it will have to meet 31 conditions to move forward.

It also still needs approval from the L.A. City Council, Caltrans, and California State Parks.

The gondola proposal has drawn a lot of public attention, with supporters arguing it’ll increase economic opportunities and help get the city ready for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Opponents, on the other hand, have argued that the gondola is a luxury amenity built on the backs of low income communities.

About the new conditions 

A motion by L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis, who sits on the Metro’s board, added sweeping conditions to the project from the nonprofit Zero Emissions Transit (ZET).

“We didn't push the bar a little bit, we threw it miles down the road,” said Ara Najarian, who has served on the board for nearly 20 years. “This is the best set of protections that are being proposed for a community ever in the history of Metro.”

Sponsored message

Included in the 31 conditions are requirements to:

  • Set aside 10% of all gondola marketing opportunities for Chinatown businesses and community-based organizations
  • Offer free unlimited rides for local Chinatown residents and businesses
  • An anti-displacement fund for affordable housing, and money to support “small and historically marginalized ethnic businesses”

The concerns of opponents

Solis said there is a very real foundation for the community’s hesitation with the gondola. Chinatown and Elysian Park neighborhoods were “disrupted and destroyed” by transportation projects in the past, but Solis said “the project requires guarantees and guard rails.”

The motion also includes a condition that any future projects at or near the stadium parking lots dedicate at least 25% of the space toward affordable housing.

Chief Anthony Morales, of the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Gabrieleno-Tongva, told LAist that the gondola will reopen wounds and continue the destruction of culturally sensitive landscape.

“It's profiting on our ancestral land, it's profiting on what they did 50 years ago when they displaced all those residents from Chavez Ravine to build the stadium,” Morales said.

Sponsored message

What’s next 

The project now heads to the city and state for approval.

But L.A. City Council President Paul Krekorian, who also sits on the Metro Board, warned that Thursday’s approval doesn’t mean future votes will go the same way.

“Councilmember [Eunisses] Hernandez will continue to advocate, and her advocacy within the city council might result in a very different outcome than whatever we approve today,” Krekorian said.

The backstory

The board was supposed to vote on the report late last month, but it was removed from the agenda after Hernandez, whose first district includes Dodger Stadium and parts of downtown L.A., introduced a motion demanding the project be put on hold.

During public comment, she urged the Metro Board to reject the gondola proposal and criticized the new conditions.

Sponsored message

“While I appreciate that the board feels it has addressed some of the concerns, I would be remiss if I didn't point out that a project that needs more than 30 checks and balances placed on it to make it palatable, many of which are not actually enforceable by this body, is a project that cannot stand on its own two feet,” Hernandez said.

If the project is approved by all three parties, the proposal will then go back to the Metro Board for additional consideration.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today