With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Dodger Stadium Gondola In Limbo Amid Growing Concerns Over Traffic and Access
A rendering of the proposed gondola in motion
(
Courtesy LA ART via L.A. Metro
)
The proposed gondola project for Dodger Stadium is now in limbo after L.A. City Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez introduced a motion demanding that it be put on hold for more traffic and access studies.
Hernandez, whose district includes Dodger Stadium and parts of downtown L.A., outlined concerns with the final environmental impact report, which Metro released on Dec. 4.
She said the report doesn’t provide clear solutions for the environmental and socioeconomic concerns raised by the surrounding communities, such as Solano Canyon, Elysian Valley, Chinatown, Angelino Heights, and Echo Park.
Hernandez added in her motion on Wednesday that it also doesn’t prove that the project is the most effective way of easing traffic on game days.
Support for LAist comes from
The motion, if approved by the full council, would force the city to “suspend any action on approving advancements” until more research is done.
What are the concerns?
A rendering of what the gondola connecting Union Station to Dodger Stadium might look like from Metro.
(
Metro
)
According to the motion, Metro hasn’t seriously studied any potential alternatives to the project, such as improving existing transportation opportunities, enhancing pedestrian and bicycle networks, and developing a zero emission targeted bus solution to the stadium.
Hernandez pointed out that the last time a traffic study was done around Dodger Stadium was more than 30 years ago. The neighboring communities have changed a lot since then, including the construction of the A and E light rails, reorganizations of the Metro bus network, the rise of rideshare services like Uber or Lyft, and more local housing and infrastructure.
“Now, Metro is asking them to absorb the impact of constructing a gondola that would fly just feet over their homes and fundamentally change the landscape of their neighborhoods, without ever demonstrating that this is the most effective and efficient way to mitigate stadium traffic,” Hernandez said in a statement.
Support for LAist comes from
A Metro map of where the proposed gondola, and all its stations, would be located.
(
Metro
)
The motion said the people living in those communities, and the full council, deserve to get a complete picture of the traffic easement options before the city commits to the gondola.
Hernandez is also concerned about the impacts on native wildlife, noise and light pollution, people’s privacy, and accelerating gentrification.
What does the motion mean?
The Metro Board of Directors postponed their vote Thursday for the environmental impact report. The report needs to be approved before the board can sign-off on the project itself. A new date was not announced.
The proposal would also need approval from the city of L.A., Caltrans, the California Department of Parks and Recreation, and the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health.
The motion instructs LADOT, in conjunction with the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) and other relevant departments, to report back on traffic policies for other venues like the Rose Bowl, Hollywood Bowl, and SoFi Stadium.
Support for LAist comes from
That report is expected to include recommendations for traffic, local parking, and community queuing policies. It also calls for options that would encourage private companies to invest in traffic mitigation measures “to reduce the adverse impacts to communities caused by their operations.”
Hernandez has offered $500,000 of her council district funds for LADOT’s “Dodger Stadium Traffic Assessment.”
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.” -
While working for the county, the DA’s office alleges that 13 employees fraudulently filed for unemployment, claiming to earn less than $600 a week. -
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to declare immigration enforcement actions a local emergency. -
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues. -
People in and around recent burn scars should be alert to the risk of debris flows. Typical October weather will be back later this week. -
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce.
Best of LAist